Channel photo updated

Channel
Prop Firm Journal
@PropFirmJournal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
440subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001876290105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PropFirmJournal |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PropFirmJournal |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 440 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 444 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 450 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 452 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 454 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 457 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 457 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 45s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 23.3% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2024 to 27 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Who is the trader you would like to challenge to a fight? 🥊
👍8
Trade, get a payout, and win crypto. Yes, that is possible with Bright Funded. 🔎 Latest prop firm review. Bright Funded: Prop Firm and Tokens | Prop Firm Review
👍2👎1
Let's delve into what the consistency rule is in prop firms and why so many traders hate it. Consistency Rule: Most Hated Rule in Prop Firms
❤1
We decided to test all the new trading platforms on prop firms: Ctrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, and Tradelocker. Which one is your favorite? Testing The New Trading Platforms on Prop Fims | PFJ Detective
👏5👍1
Time to review Lark Funding. Famous for their 1-phase and 3-phase challenges, we decided it was time to review them. Lark Funding: Is This The Best 1-Phase Challenge? | Prop Firm Review
Chris Hunter, CEO of Maven Funding, talked with us about the future of prop firms and the latest changes in the industry. The Future of Prop Firms | Chris Hunter CEO of Maven Funding
👍1🤔1
We put together in a video everything you need to know about prop firms. Everything About Prop Firms | PFJ Detective
👍1
What is the easiest prop firm challenge? PFJ Detective will answer you. https://youtu.be/z79b015-xe0
Funding Pips back in the business. 👏 Fast comeback. Check out the latest news on our IG
❤4
The prop firm review this week was on Audacity Capital. This firm offers the usual 2-step challenge, but they also have monthly fee challenges. We dissected them to see if it's worth it. Audacity Capital - Funded With Monthly Fee | Prop Firm Review
👍2
What is happening in the prop firm/evaluation firm industry? FTMO, OANDA, Funded Next, and The5ers just banned US traders. On the other hand, True Forex Funds and Funding Pips are now frozen and can't execute trades. Is this the end of the industry? The END of PROP FIRMS?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PropFirmJournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Prop Firm Journal” (@PropFirmJournal), 440 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PropFirmJournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.