6 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 382–398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 18:38
387
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:14
388
-8
14 Aug 2026, 09:14
396
+8
8 Aug 2026, 06:03
388
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:21
388
+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:58
384
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (13 November 2025 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
268
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
21
32.8%
❤
17
26.6%
😁
10
15.6%
👏
8
12.5%
😱
2
3.13%
🥰
2
3.13%
🍓
1
1.56%
🐳
1
1.56%
👍
1
1.56%
🤷♂
1
1.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Initials out at x3 (play money only) and let the rest ride on WORTHLESS.
Really interested on this one, apparently the first meme on PONS based on Legend of Zelda, pulling in crazy views per tweet, and a meme that resonates with the FOMO crowd. Ticker is $LINK
https://x.com/_hoodLink_/status/2084979233345179717
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x835e4b15d72029866108393f1bbcb34d7bc04399
In from $200k or so....
WOOF 🔥
WALLET ⏳
Took a punt on WORTHLESS in the meantime, entry $200k or so...
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x06b6024281cba79309026285c912ec3912671392
Thesis: I like the chart, rounded bottom, wallet alerts fired, that's it. It's a microcap, so play money only.
All the action is on Robinhood now folks. x15 and counting on $WOOF with is connections to the $SHIB deployer. Time to lock in.
https://x.com/LordDurden/status/2084514782795760026?s=20
Still holding $WALLET also.
As for general market thoughts, previous cycle ATH remains the key battle ground for now....
https://x.com/LordDurden/status/2030287204149346649?s=20
Close the weekly below this - we likely settle between the WMA 200 and WMA 300
Close the weekly above - $80k comes into sight
This tweet has my levels to watch and how I will be playing it
Weathered a 75%+ drawdown on the Botcoin position and now back to above water, just have a feeling about this one given the burgeoning agent meta that I see churning in the background.
My scanner as well also says this ticks all the boxes: holder quality, LP to MC ratio, etc....
https://dexscreener.com/base/0x5154ba0d6cfb5fe27644bc856064991e1c7672b7eb533d5d457db4c7144c2af5
Fingers crossed
MLTL hit around a x3 ($1M MC > $3M MC) and rotated part of this into BotCoin. Really interesting agentic coin that aligns with the feeling that agentic related narratives will be the ones to kick this market back into gear. Entry around $2M MC on BotCoin. Looks very good.
https://dexscreener.com/base/0x5154ba0d6cfb5fe27644bc856064991e1c7672b7eb533d5d457db4c7144c2af5
I think the thing to do in this market is take in…
Hope you're surviving friends. This will pass. And we will emerge stronger. Reminds me of both the 2020 COVID crash and the April tariff madness so far.
We are approaching deep bargain territory if we drop more today: https://x.com/LordDurden/status/2019560644744466443?s=20
I think AI agents is the next meta that gets real legs: https://x.com/LordDurden/status/2018947011244908670?s=20
This time with actual legs...…
What a year it was friends. Wild and insane volatility. Onwards and upwards in 2026 for us all 🍾
Overall for 2025 given what was a savage year in many regards am largely happy with performance 📊
We caught 4 of the biggest runners with $KTA (x60), $AVICI (x10), $PENGU (x10) and $TRILLIONS (x20) and have honed the system to ensure far less round tripping in future 📈
Backtested this past week and made amendments to …
Re-entered AVICI on this breakout targeting ATH. Entry at the $3 fib. Sadly the other MetaDAO coins have performed poorly and AVICI seems to be the clear winner so far. Clean invalidation if lose the fib at $3.
https://dexscreener.com/solana/5gB4NPgFB3MHFHSeKN4sbaY6t9MB8ikCe9HyiKYid4Td
Edit/ updates: Still in this, and exited the other "Neobank" beta plays I tried like SURF and TigerPayX as want to keep concentrate…
🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProjectMayhemCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project Mayhem” (@ProjectMayhemCrypto), 387 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProjectMayhemCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.