Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Price Bag Lounge

Channel

Price Bag Lounge

@PriceBagCrypt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53,033subscribers

-807 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906227067
TypeChannel
Username@PriceBagCrypt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PriceBagCrypt

Growth

53,03353,84053,436.57 August 2026 — 53,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,823 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,683 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,590 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,520 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,501 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,484 subscribers15 August 2026 — 53,429 subscribers17 August 2026 — 53,334 subscribers18 August 2026 — 53,299 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,250 subscribers20 August 2026 — 53,218 subscribers21 August 2026 — 53,188 subscribers22 August 2026 — 53,162 subscribers24 August 2026 — 53,114 subscribers25 August 2026 — 53,100 subscribers26 August 2026 — 53,071 subscribers27 August 2026 — 53,098 subscribers28 August 2026 — 53,093 subscribers29 August 2026 — 53,063 subscribers30 August 2026 — 53,033 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -807. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,912–53,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 21:1453,033-30
29 Aug 2026, 19:3553,063-30
28 Aug 2026, 22:1453,093-5
27 Aug 2026, 18:4553,098+27
26 Aug 2026, 17:4253,071-29
25 Aug 2026, 16:3753,100-14
24 Aug 2026, 13:3753,114-48
22 Aug 2026, 20:0853,162-26
21 Aug 2026, 11:0953,188-30
20 Aug 2026, 08:4853,218-32
19 Aug 2026, 05:5453,250-49
18 Aug 2026, 08:5253,299-35
17 Aug 2026, 09:2653,334-95
15 Aug 2026, 19:4853,429-55
14 Aug 2026, 08:1753,484-17
12 Aug 2026, 21:5753,501-19
11 Aug 2026, 21:4253,520-70
10 Aug 2026, 22:3653,590-93
10 Aug 2026, 00:0253,683-56
9 Aug 2026, 01:1053,739first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 53,033 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held34 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total462,470
Reactions total2,589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,589 reactions across 34 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯82631.9%
🏆32812.7%
32112.4%
👏29511.4%
🤝1525.87%
👍1445.56%
🔥1335.14%
🐳1124.33%
🫡793.05%
🤩582.24%
👌552.12%
🍾371.43%
250.966%
🦄140.541%
👾60.232%
💊40.154%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
836
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 34 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
47
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PriceBagCrypt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,710 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

The little blue badge before our channel name means we're officially verified, please avoid any other channel claiming to be us without being verified. My only username is @juluobtc Official Price Bag Channels ~ @PriceBagCrypt @FAQPriceBag @TrackRecordPB

👏6🤝5🫡5🏆32🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,990 views36 reactionsread 14 August 2026

This is the second $AKE trade we've posted in the free premium, the first one we secured a 13x gain and today we've just caught a 6x gain. Can this month get any better? let's see

💯15🏆6🔥6👏52🐳2

14 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈2,060 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Before and after on my $AKE holdings

👏8🦄5🐳4🔥3💯1

14 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,060 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🏆75🐳5🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,650 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$AKE is up another 500% since our previous post. Chart ~ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/akedo/

🏆8👏54💯3🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈20,100 views250 reactions24 Starsread 14 August 2026

If your new here and would like to join us in the Free Premium and get access to our trades then message me @juluobtc for the invite link would you like to see our previous trades? read @TrackRecordPB. For more information about the premium read @FAQPriceBag

👍136🏆6617🍾9🤝9🤩8💯5

11 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈20,000 views43 reactions25 Starsread 14 August 2026

280 of you guys made money from $TUT and $BMT in the premium that's brilliant

🏆14🤝10🐳86🔥5

11 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈19,900 views709 reactions33 Starsread 14 August 2026

Who made profit from our posts in the Free Premium telling you all to buy some $TUT and $BMT? react with 💯 let's see a show of hands

💯66114👏11🏆9🐳7🤝7

10 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈15,000 views64 reactions27 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

turning $36k into $120k on BubbleMaps lmao

👏2113🤝11🏆9🐳7🫡3

10 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈14,800 views66 reactions25 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Another wild gain this time on $BMT, posted in the Free Premium at $0.0135 on the 8th we sold at $0.0415 for 3x profit 🤝

🔥23👏13🐳10🍾8🏆7💯41

9 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC≈14,200 views65 reactions26 Starsread 14 August 2026

The craziest thing about our most recent gains is that if you joined our free premium channel back when we made this post you would have made the exact gains you've seen us posting recently, congrats to those who did. View all of our previous trades in @TrackRecordPB... want to learn more? read @FAQPriceBag

🏆2015👏9🤝8🐳7💯6

9 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC≈14,100 views54 reactions21 Starsread 14 August 2026

Its not always about what you know when it comes to crypto, its more about who you know and what connections you have

14🏆13🤝12🫡8🦄7

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @PriceBagCrypt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,574 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Price Bag Lounge” (@PriceBagCrypt), 53,033 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PriceBagCrypt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.