Channel
@PreClic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
634subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001281861131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PreClic |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PreClic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 634 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 636 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 636 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Esta tarde la #enfermera @GVAclinic del #HospitalMalvarrosa Elena García Redondo participa en la #LCPreclic24 sobre un ECA para el manejo del dolor persistente por Herpes Zoster en pacientes de edad avanzada. Puedes seguirla en directo (19:00) o diferido en https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpKm7CLOTOA
¡Tenemos nuevo episodio de #PreClicLectura programado! En el número 23 vamos a leer y criticar un artículo relacionado con las temidas ampollas del peregrino... ¿qué será mejor, calcetines de fibras sintéticas o naturales? Pues con esta premisa, y con la ayuda de nuestro invitado Jorge, enfermero y estudiante de último curso de podología, revisaremos métodos, resultados, contexto y alguna que otra tontería de cose…
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
¡PreClicqueros y PreCliqueras! Llevamos un tiempo sin decir nada por aquí porque nos hemos tomado un descansito, así sin avisar ni nada. Nuestras actividades varias no nos dejan mucho tiempo libre, pero no queremos dejar de, tanto en tanto, seguir en la senda de la crítica (que esta es una actividad que hay que practicar). Hoy lunes 24 de abril a las 19:00 (UTC+2) vamos a emitir el episodio 22 de #PreClicLectura …
Photo, posted without a caption
Fuente: Wikimedia Commons
Esta semana recogemos la pregunta que nos lanzama una de nuestras PreCliqueras, sobre si es necesario lavar con suero fisiológico el ojo antes de recoger una muestra de exudado conjuntival. Nos hemos lanzado a contestarla y aquí tenéis las... Conclusiones de PreClic 👁 Respecto a la pregunta de esta semana, hemos encontrado muy poquita información. Únicamente una guía y algunos protocolos nos han aportado pistas. Es…
Photo, posted without a caption
-No puedo tragar nada!🤕 -Que trague una miaja de pan!👩🦳 -Endoscopia directa!😷 -Ponedle un glucagón!💉 -Eso no es para la hipoglucemia?🤨 -Para esto también!🤓 Qué evidencia existe en el uso de glucagón para las impactaciones? Con lo que hemos encontrado en nuestra búsqueda os traemos la ... Conclusión de PreClic El uso fuera de ficha técnica de los fármacos debe considerarse solo en contadas ocasiones y cuando exist…
Photo, posted without a caption
Frank Garrido Aguilera nos preguntaba a través del Messenger de Facebook "... los vendajes compresivos para inmovilizar muñecas, tobillos etc. por esguinces ¿Le ponéis algodón antes del crepé o no? ¿Qué evidencia científica existe sobre eso? En mi hospital existen los profesionales que lo hacen de una manera u otra. Gracias" Nos encantan las preguntas sobre variabilidad en la práctica clínica Frank. Y este es uno de…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PreClic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,442,686 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PreClic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PreClic” (@PreClic), 634 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PreClic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.