5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,549–5,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 05:36
5,553
-13
10 Aug 2026, 15:42
5,566
-13
7 Aug 2026, 22:34
5,579
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:17
5,581
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:08
5,581
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 5,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
853
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.057%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (4 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
8,531
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 48m
Average length
36m 09s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dear Aspirants,🙏
We know how frustrating it feels when you study so much but don't get the marks you expected in Mains.
That's exactly why we created "The Answer Behind the Rank"—a series where Mayuri Ma'am (2-time UPSC Mains candidate) shares the small fundamentals and practical answer-writing techniques that can make a real difference in your score.
If you have 15–20 minutes today, do watch an episode. We genuin…
Hello everyone, We will be starting the Enrichment session at 2:00PM. Be ready
Zoom Link in Closed group -
For Mains 2026 Aspirants - Click here
For Mains 2027 Aspirants - Click here
Enrichment Sessions Recording are here: All 4 sessions Till now!
1️⃣ 3-Step Method to Crack Mains Answer Writing
2️⃣ GS1 Strategy with Ayushi Sijeria Ma’am (AIR 914 | 115 Marks in GS1)
3️⃣ Committee Recommendations for GS 1, 2, 3 & 4
4️⃣ Best Practices for GS 1, 2, 3, 4 & Essay
If you’re preparing for Mains 2026/2027, try to watch these sessions and, more importantly, revise and apply the frameworks in your answ…
25 Questions in UPSC prelims 2026, (17 fully solvable) from one 273 pages sources!! (Yes takes only 10 mins a day)- Check out the video to know about it!
Join this group only if you have watched video and will be disciplined! (Click here to join, free entry for 100 members)
🆘Next FREE Enrichment Session for UPSC Mains!
Topic: Fundamental Rights, DPSPs & Fundamental Duties.
See how this simple knowledge can be used across ALL Mains Papers to enrich your answers.
📌 Register Now to join closed groups(And get Free Important resources, Notes and sessions):
For Mains 2026 Aspirants - Click here
For Mains 2027 Aspirants - Click here
13 students who attended these Enrichment Sessions secured…
Hello Aspirants, This session was taken by 13 Topper in CSE 2025(Paid sessions). This year we are giving it for FREE. We Request your to join this today at 9 PM and improve your score in Mains.
Zoom link will be shared in the Closed group.
4th FREE Enrichment Session is Here!
Last year, this Best Practices session helped aspirants enrich their Mains answers with 20+ relevant examples in the actual UPSC exam. Many rankers and students found it extremely useful for answer writing and value addition.
📚 Topic: Best Practices for GS 1, GS 2, GS 3, GS 4 & Essay
Before attending: Please read and revise the shared PDF. The session will focus on how to use t…
AIR 104 Aryan Sir Discussing UPSC Mains 2026 Answers
If you missed the live session conducted under Lakshya by Shubham Ajmera Sir, here's the recording for you.
In this session, Aryan Sir (AIR 104) discusses
1. Real Mains answers,
2. Highlights common mistakes,
3. Shares practical insights that can significantly improve your answer writing for UPSC Mains 2026.
If you'd like to attend a 1-to-1 live answer discussio…
✅ Repeating Case study themes as per PYQs.
Every year new case studies come, but themes always repeat, and if you have: Articles, quotes, judgements, delimmas, committees etc in advance prepared for most themes you are going to solve then its highly likely you will score exceptional marks.
✔️ This PDF is exactly in that direction.
Many more such documents will be available for Lakshay free batch too. (Click here t…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @PrayasAI_UPSC_Prelims. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hello Aspirants, Have you joined this free enrichment closed group yet?
Yes45%
Filling up the form right now32%
No23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PrayasAI Prelims” (@PrayasAI_UPSC_Prelims), 5,553 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrayasAI_UPSC_Prelims.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
