Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PowerChat - Channel

Channel

PowerChat - Channel

@PowerChatChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

275subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001383462475
TypeChannel
Username@PowerChatChannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 15 December 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PowerChatChannel

Growth

2752772766 August 2026 — 277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 277 subscribers15 August 2026 — 276 subscribers22 August 2026 — 275 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:17275-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:06276-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:31277no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:38277first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 December 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 11 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4736.4%
1310.1%
👍118.53%
👏96.98%
💯75.43%
🤔64.65%
🤬64.65%
🎉43.10%
😁43.10%
🥰43.10%
32.33%
🆒32.33%
🐳32.33%
🤩21.55%
❤‍🔥10.775%
🍾10.775%
👾10.775%
😍10.775%
🤨10.775%
🤯10.775%
1 further kind10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2019 to 2 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2023, 19:30 UTC713 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

אני גאה להכריז שהמערכת החדשה פתוחה לכולם 🎁 הקישור: הא שיט זה היה אתמול

🤬6😁4🐳1👍1👾1🤨1🤯1🥱1

31 Jan 2023, 19:08 UTC731 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

בניית הבוט והגדרתו תתבצע מתוך אפליקציית web חדשנית אשר תאפשר לבנות את הבוט ללא צורך בידע בתכנות בצורה ויזואלית נוחה ופשוטה ככל הניתן.

🥰3🆒3👏1

31 Jan 2023, 19:07 UTC717 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

הרעיון שלנו להביא מוצר עיסקי איכותי ויציב לשוק הישראלי, שיאפשר לעסק (B) להביא מידע סטטי ודינאמי עם אפשרויות מכירה ללקוח הקצה (P)

2👍1

31 Jan 2023, 19:06 UTC681 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Payments בנוסף, לאחר מאמץ גדול, הוספנו אפשרויות למוצרים + סליקת אשראי ישירות ברובוט, מאפליקציית טלגרם

🔥3

31 Jan 2023, 18:44 UTC574 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

המערכת הקודמת תוכננה בשיטת TAP שזה Trigger Action(s) Permission(s) ישנם טריגרים, שגורמים לעשות פעולה מסויימת לאלו שיש להם הרשאות. פעם סוגי הטריגרים היו מעטים, כמו: שליחת הודעה לרובוט, משתמש חדש נכנס לקבוצה, משתמש מבצע חיפוש, או משתמש ב inline_query. היום, המערכת תומכת במעל 30 סוגי טריגרים שונים בינהם, כניסה ויציאה מערוץ או קבוצה, שליחת כל סוג הודעה (יש מעל 10 סוגים), כניסה או השתקה של הבוט, וכן הלאה. בנוסף לראש

🔥4👍2

18 Oct 2022, 18:46 UTC647 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

חלק 2

  1. ברור, תשלח91%
  2. פחות, זה משעמם9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎉3👍2👏2🤔1🤩1

18 Oct 2022, 18:26 UTC622 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

הסיפור של PowerChat ⚡️ \ חלק 1 📝 לפני ההתחלה ליצור את מערכת פאוורצ'אט לא היה פשוט. ❗️ בהתחלה זה היה חבר 🧑‍🎓 שהגיע וניסה לפתח מערכת דומה לפאקבוט ולמאניבוט עם עוד כל מיני פיצ'רים, אבל כל מתכנת או קבוצת מתכנתים שניסו לעשות משהו דומה התאיישו עוד בשלב התכנון וה POC שזה קיצור באנגלית להוכחת היתכנות, כלומר לנסות לעשות משהו בקטנה להוכיח שזה עובד ואז לבנות את זה כמו שצריך בצורה חכמה. 💡 נכנסתי לקבוצה של החבר המתכנת, ויצאתי

11🔥5👍1👏1🥰1

3 Oct 2022, 21:16 UTC574 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️PowerChat היא מערכת העובדת על פלטפורמת טלגרם המאפשרת ליצור בוטים חכמים ללא צורך בידע בתכנות. המערכת הייתה מהמובילות בשוק הישראלי בשנת 2018 ועכשיו כ- 5 שנים לאחר מכן המערכת יוצאת בגרסה חדשה עם ממשק פשוט ונוח שיתן לכם את הכלים ליצור בוט חכם בטלגרם בקלות ובמהירות. בהודעה הקודמת שלחנו סקיצה של PowerTokens שעדיין לא גילנו לכם מה זה, אבל תהיו בטוחים שתרצו שיהיה לכם כמה שיותר מזה. אנחנו ניתן כמות של PowerTokens מתנה לכ

🔥15👍3👏3🐳21❤‍🔥1🍾1🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PowerChatChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Oct 2022, 18:46 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

חלק 2

  1. ברור, תשלח91%
  2. פחות, זה משעמם9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2021, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,330 voters approx.

📣 עצומה - לפתוח את פאוורצאט מחדש ובחינם (תגיעו ל 1,000)

  1. 👍🏻 בעד96%
  2. 👎🏻 נגד4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2020, 23:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz177 voters

פאוורצאט

  1. זה אהבה77%
  2. לא שימושי23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2019 to 2 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,548,159 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PowerChat - Channel” (@PowerChatChannel), 275 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PowerChatChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.