Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hawaii

@PomeloHN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

416subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002445481155
TypeChannel
Username@PomeloHN
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PomeloHN

Growth

4144164157 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 414 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:34 — 414 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:47 — 416 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:468 Aug 2026, 21:47
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 414–416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:47416+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:34414no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:46414first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.2%
avg views ÷ 416 subscribers
Avg views / post
408
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,308
Reactions total1,290
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,290 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522665471736231804128722.2%
custom 540436315964757549622717.6%
14010.9%
custom 53394017707056350081289.92%
custom 54045273906070416421219.38%
🔥1098.45%
💋715.50%
🥰665.12%
🤗513.95%
custom 5375488158941080431322.48%
custom 5404546937003207520241.86%
custom 5226767881160633821120.93%
custom 5258480983371431557120.93%
🌭50.388%
🎉20.155%
💅20.155%
😭10.078%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 13 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
67
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PomeloHN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC260 views102 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Саймонстеллы ода. У меня куча скетчей по Гаваям так что будет много Гавайев..🌟 И еще я немного болею поэтому артики немного реже выходят...😔

48custom 533940177070563500823🔥14custom 52266547173623180416custom 54043631596475754965custom 54045273906070416424💋2

31 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC408 views95 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очередная подборка всякой дичи с моими персонажами 🤩 И вщ спасибо за активность, вы ставите так много реакций и комментируете мои посты, мне очен очен очен приятно и меня это мотивирует спамить артами сюда...вщвщ всех люблю целую обнимаю🤩

custom 522665471736231804145custom 540454693700320752018custom 5339401770705635008136custom 54043631596475754965🔥4custom 54045273906070416423💅1

31 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC317 views106 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Держите жоскую коллабу с крутым худом !!

custom 522665471736231804145🔥27custom 533940177070563500819custom 5404363159647575496112💅1custom 54045469370032075201

29 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC414 views135 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Селфиш развалился 👎

💋59custom 540452739060704164239custom 533940177070563500825custom 540436315964757549672custom 52266547173623180412custom 52584809833714315571

29 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC344 views124 reactions67 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня день рождение у главного донатера звёзд этого ТГК по совместительству одного из главных фанатов моих персонажей и вселенной.❤️❤️

custom 522665471736231804164🥰20custom 5339401770705635008178custom 53754881589410804317custom 54043631596475754967🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC522 views105 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я не могла не сделать этого.. Надеюсь картинку все видели и кидать реф не придется..

🥰46custom 54043631596475754962119custom 53394017707056350086custom 54045273906070416426🎉2custom 52266547173623180412custom 52584809833714315572

26 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC488 views71 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Держите две кмм для- @coolpumpkin2036

custom 540436315964757549641custom 533940177070563500816custom 54045273906070416429custom 522665471736231804132

26 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC387 views83 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

НИФИГА ВАС УЖЕ СКОЛЬКО..400...Я И ПОДУМАТЬ НЕ МОГЛА ЧТО У МЕНЯ КОГДА-ТО БУДЕТ СТОЛЬКО ПОДПИСЧИКОВ..🤯 СПАСИБО ЧТО ПРОДОЛЖАЕТЕ СЛЕДИТЬ ЗА МОИМ ТВОРЧЕСТВОМ ВСЕХ ЛЮБЛЮ!! 😭😭❤️❤️ КАК ЗАКОНЧУ С РАБОТАМИ В ЗИН ЖДИТЕ КУЧУ АРТОВ❤️❤️❤️

🤗38custom 540436315964757549621custom 5404527390607041642155custom 52584809833714315573custom 53754881589410804311

25 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC488 views102 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

САМЫЙ ВНЕЗАПНЫЙ ТРЕЙД ПЯТОЧЕК ВИЛВУДА И СЕЛФИША С МЕСТНОЙ ЛЕГЕНДОЙ СПАСИБО ЗА ПЯТОЧКИ НАШЕ СВЯТИЛИЩЕ 🙏🙏🙏🙏

custom 522665471736231804153🔥2114custom 54045273906070416424🌭3custom 54043631596475754963custom 54045469370032075203custom 52584809833714315571

25 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC381 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я конечно стараюсь ничего сюда не репостить.. НО Я НЕ МОГУ НЕ ПОДЕЛИТСЯ КАКОЙ КРУТОЙ АРТ МНЕ НАРИСОВАЛИ, МЕНЯ УНИЧТОЖИЛИРАСТОПЛАЛИВЗОРВАЛИ СПАСИБО БОЛЬШОЕ ЕЩЕ РАЗ МНЕ ОЧЕНЬ ОЧЕНЬОЧЕНЬПРИЯТНО((((((((( 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

27🤗11🔥9

25 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC353 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @streema_sosPhoto

никогда не угадаете кто это ⚠️

custom 540452739060704164234custom 540436315964757549619custom 522676788116063382110custom 52266547173623180415🔥1custom 52584809833714315571

23 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC477 views163 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оказалось реально ветер подул.... Исправляюсь держите виву 🤩

custom 522665471736231804162custom 540436315964757549642🔥30custom 53394017707056350088custom 540452739060704164275custom 52584809833714315573🤗2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @PomeloHN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 157,717 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hawaii” (@PomeloHN), 416 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PomeloHN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.