💥47 % WOLLEN MERKEL ANGEBLICH ALS BUNDESPRÄSIDENT?💥 Wenn man dieser Umfrage glauben schenken möchte, ist dieses Land wirklich am Ende. 🦅#TEAMHEIMAT🇩🇪
🍌1

Channel
@Politik_Medien_Deutschland
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
140subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488813473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Politik_Medien_Deutschland |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Politik_Medien_Deutschland |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 140 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 141 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 142 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 143 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💥47 % WOLLEN MERKEL ANGEBLICH ALS BUNDESPRÄSIDENT?💥 Wenn man dieser Umfrage glauben schenken möchte, ist dieses Land wirklich am Ende. 🦅#TEAMHEIMAT🇩🇪
🍌1
💥BEHRENS: DAS MATERIAL IST NICHT WEG👍💥 Der Journalist @deniz_karabag_ hat aber 24 Seiten gesichert und bietet sie allen Verteidigern der Demokratie an. 🦅#TEAMHEIMAT🇩🇪
👍1
Die Corona-geschädigten Eltern sind fette, rauchende Säufer geworden – jetzt soll der Staat die Kinder in den Kitas retten. Sagt jedenfalls Andreas Gassen, Vorsitzender der Kassenärztlichen Vereinigung – Vom relativen Kritiker pauschaler Eingriffe zum Präventions-Erzieher: https://www.alexander-wallasch.de/gesellschaft/die-corona-geschaedigten-eltern-sind-fette-rauchende-saeufer-jetzt-soll-der-staat-die-kinder-in-den…
🍌1
BREAKING ++ Uni Cambridge besetzt freigewordene Professur mit Karl Lauterbach Die Dekanin der Fakultät erklärte @Karl_Lauterbach sei der "beste Gesundheitsforscher der Welt" und man sei "überglücklich ihn gewonnen zu haben".
🤣1
Früher nannte man so etwas: Räuberpistole. Streue einen Verdacht und schwupps wird daraus ein begründeter Fall, ein ultimativer Beweis, das gefundene Fressen. Nur hinterher sind wieder Millionen tot und die Welt liegt in Schutt und Asche. Ab dem 13. Jahrhundert wurden unschuldige Menschen für Missernten, Seuchen, Unglücke und das Wetter verantwortlich gemacht: Hexenverfolgung. Der Spanisch-Amerikanische Krieg begann…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Meinungs(un)freiheit: Linksextremistin Brosius-Gersdorf fordert Zensurbehörde für soziale Medien Die (Gottseidank) als Verfassungsrichterin gerade noch verhinderte linksextremistische Juristin Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf hat eine Behördenaufsicht für soziale Medien gefordert. Ein Jahr nach ihrer gescheiterten Kandidatur für das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat sich die Potsdamer Verfassungsrechtlerin mit mehreren Medienint…
Gaslighting à la CDU. Das ist nur noch erbärmlich!💩🤮🤮 Meine Kanäle: @Der_Corona_Irrsinn @Politik_Medien_Deutschland @Islam_und_Fluechtlinge
🤡1
Die grösste Gefahr für Deutschland geht nicht von den immer wieder beschworenen "hybriden Angriffen" Moskaus aus, sondern von Politikern, die mit bemerkenswertem Eifer Szenarien für einen baldigen Krieg mit Russland entwerfen und den deutschen Bürgern nahelegen, sich daran zu beteiligen.🤮💩 Meine Kanäle: @Der_Corona_Irrsinn @Politik_Medien_Deutschland @Islam_und_Fluechtlinge
❤1👍1
Interessant ist auch, dass sich der Busfahrer mit seiner Sightseeing-Tour so nah an diesem, angeblich mit 150 bis 200 Tonnen Munition beladenen Flugzeug der Ukraine, nähern konnte. (Was haben die überhaupt auf einem zivilen Flughafen gemacht???) Zudem... Eenn man bedenkt, dass es ein ganzer Touribus voller Flugzeug Enthusiasten gewesen sein soll, die für diese Tour gute 40 Euro bezahlt haben und keiner hat seine …
❤1🍌1
Homburg zur Busfahrer-Story: „Zufällig vorbeikommender Busfahrer erlegt Semtex-Drohne per Fußtritt! Sämtliche Leitmedien finden das glaubhaft. Aber auch NIUS und Apollo fallen auf den absurdesten Nonsens herein, seit Chinesen die Straßen von Viren reinigten. Hintergrund: Einige fürchten, Berlin wolle den Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall ausrufen, mit noch krasseren Lockdowns. Das ist unplausibel, denn Kriegsvorber…
👍1
Bundesverfassungsgericht gibt Kompetenzen ab Vogelfrei durch EU-Recht? Dr. Ulrich Vosgerau über den Kollaps des deutschen Rechtsschutzes Staatsrechtler Ulrich Vosgerau wirft dem Bundesverfassungsgericht vor, seine Rolle als Hüter der Grundrechte zunehmend aufzugeben. Im Gespräch mit Maximilian Tichy erklärt er anhand von EU-Sanktionen, Wahlprüfung und Chatkontrolle, warum er von einer „Kapitulation des Bundesverfass…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Politik_Medien_Deutschland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Politik_Medien_Deutschland named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Politik und unsere Medien” (@Politik_Medien_Deutschland), 140 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Politik_Medien_Deutschland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.