Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یادداشت‌های تاریخ سیاسی

Channel

یادداشت‌های تاریخ سیاسی

@Political_historyi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

352subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001901268557
TypeChannel
Username@Political_historyi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Political_historyi

Growth

3523563547 August 2026 — 356 subscribers8 August 2026 — 356 subscribers15 August 2026 — 352 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 351–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:24352-4
8 Aug 2026, 06:45356no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:21356first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Jan 2026, 10:59 UTC440 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScoVznvcI9cnySe-0eEFboe6uKwAqt2s95WpGOnbgtuv13F3A/viewform پرسشنامه تخمین شمار جاویدنامان و آسیب‌دیدگان، بی‌نیاز از اطلاعات هویتی.

26 Jan 2026, 10:31 UTC606 viewsread 8 August 2026

این روزها خیلی‌ها فکر می‌کنن همه‌چی با یک حمله‌ امریکا حل می‌شه. انگار ایران فقط یک هدف نظامی است و نه یک ساختار شبکه‌ای از قدرت. همین‌جا باید سر شباهت ترامپ به اندرو جکسون را باز کنیم. جکسون نه فقط یک رئیس‌جمهور جنگ‌طلب بود، بلکه دولت را ابزار تهدید و معامله می‌دید. یعنی سیاست خارجی برایش مثل یک بازی فشار بود؛ اول ضربه می‌زنی، بعد می‌گویی حالا بیا مذاکره کنیم. نه برای اینکه دموکراسی بیاری، بلکه برای اینکه وضعیت ق

25 Jan 2026, 21:43 UTC410 viewsread 8 August 2026

اگر باور می‌کنین که بوی سیر عوض می‌شه بدونین طینت شاه شریر عوض می‌شه این بکش‌بکش، این بگیر‌بگیر عوض می‌شه قاتلِ مرد و زن و جوون و پیر عوض می‌شه ما می‌گیم نون نداریم، خمیرگیر عوض می‌شه ما می‌گیم شاه نمی‌خوایم، نخست‌وزیر عوض می‌شه می‌گیم مرکز هر توطئه‌ای درباره‌ی ما می‌گیم شاه نماینده‌ی استعماره لانه‌اش مرکز فرماندهیِ کشتاره خلق از این مرکز بیدادگری بیزاره اگر دیر تخته بشه، رژیم دیر عوض می‌شه ما می‌گیم شاه نمی‌خوایم

25 Jan 2026, 06:58 UTC374 viewsread 8 August 2026

قبل از موضع گرفتن، این توییت را بخوانید. نه دفاع نه حمله، مرور مختصر و جمع‌وجور از صحبت‌های اخیر رضا پهلوی.

Signed Sorena

25 Jan 2026, 02:28 UTC355 viewsread 8 August 2026

به خاطر دارید وقتی دستگاه سرکوب از تراکم سلول‌ها درماند، بازداشت‌شدگان را قطره‌چکانی رها کرد، اما بسیاری زنده نماندند؟ تا جایی که می‌توانید تاکید کنید هر آزادشده‌ای باید فورا به پزشک مورد اعتماد مراجعه کند.

Signed Sorena

24 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC415 viewsread 8 August 2026

در این شب‌های خون‌خورده، انقلاب تبدیل شد به صحنه‌ رقابت قدرت و فداکاری مردم، خوراک خودنمایی پهلوی. با شعارهای بی‌پشتوانه، جوانان را به کشتار سپردند و خون‌شان را در دفتر مشروعیت بدیلِ خود ثبت کردند؛ چند ده هزار جان، تنها برای پر کردن رزومه شاه شدن.

Signed Sorena

24 Jan 2026, 14:10 UTC438 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

نظر شما درمورد مداخله نظامی ایالات متحده با توجه به وضعیت کنونی ایران چیست؟

  1. کاملا موافقم؛ مداخله نظامی آمریکا را تنها راه تغییر اساسی وضعیت سیاسی می‌دانم.40%
  2. تا حدی موافقم؛ اگر مداخله محدود و با هدف مشخص باشد، می‌تواند به تغییر وضعیت کمک کند.24%
  3. تا حدی مخالفم؛ مداخله نظامی را پرهزینه و خطرناک می‌دانم، هرچند وضعیت موجود نیز قابل‌قبول نیست.23%
  4. کاملا مخالفم؛ با هرگونه مداخله نظامی خارجی در ایران مخالف و تغییر باید صرفا از درون جامعه صورت گیرد.13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Sorena

23 Jan 2026, 19:41 UTC≈6,500 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

یه انسان افتاده روی زمین، مچاله، تاخورده در خودش، بی‌دفاع؛ بدنی که یاد گرفته جمع بشه تا زنده بمونه. ماسک روی صورتشه، یعنی معترضه، یعنی ترسیده، یعنی هنوز نفس می‌کشه و همین هنوز جرمشه. بالای سرش قمه‌ست؛ نه سایه، نه استعاره، خودِ تیغه. آزادی خوابیده روی آسفالت، کشیده شده روی زمین مثل کلمه‌ای که اجازه‌ی کامل شدن نداشت. تمام این سال‌ها همین بوده یکی می‌لرزه چون زنده‌ست، یکی می‌بره چون قدرت داره؛ یکی حق می‌خواد با صدا، ی

Signed Sorena

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Political_historyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jan 2026, 14:10 UTCFinal Results70 voters

نظر شما درمورد مداخله نظامی ایالات متحده با توجه به وضعیت کنونی ایران چیست؟

  1. کاملا موافقم؛ مداخله نظامی آمریکا را تنها راه تغییر اساسی وضعیت سیاسی می‌دانم.40%
  2. تا حدی موافقم؛ اگر مداخله محدود و با هدف مشخص باشد، می‌تواند به تغییر وضعیت کمک کند.24%
  3. تا حدی مخالفم؛ مداخله نظامی را پرهزینه و خطرناک می‌دانم، هرچند وضعیت موجود نیز قابل‌قبول نیست.23%
  4. کاملا مخالفم؛ با هرگونه مداخله نظامی خارجی در ایران مخالف و تغییر باید صرفا از درون جامعه صورت گیرد.13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 28 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 841,533 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یادداشت‌های تاریخ سیاسی” (@Political_historyi), 352 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Political_historyi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.