Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог Полина Калюжная

Channel

Психолог Полина Калюжная

@PolinaCare

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

830subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321932830
TypeChannel
Username@PolinaCare
Created10 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PolinaCare

Growth

8308408356 August 2026 — 839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 840 subscribers14 August 2026 — 830 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 829–842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:56830-10
6 Aug 2026, 16:08840+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:05839no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:51839first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 830 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held10 (10 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,108
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10340.7%
🔥8031.6%
😍218.30%
💯176.72%
👍155.93%
🤯114.35%
😱62.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC112 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А я к вам с еще одной подборкой картин, которые точно заслуживают внимания ❤️ 1️⃣ Мастер (2012) Что происходит, когда человек отчаянно ищет того, кто даст ответы на все вопросы? Фильм тонко показывает психологию зависимости, механизм идеализации и то, почему в периоды внутренней пустоты мы особенно уязвимы перед харизматичными лидерами. Великолепная работа про перенос, потребность в опоре и поиск собственной иденти

🔥117😍5

Signed Полина Калюжная

5 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC140 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💋 Сентябрь. Старт закрытого женского сообщества «Новая Я» В сентябре мы запускаем закрытое женское сообщество «Новая Я». Каждый месяц мы будем вместе разбирать одну важную тему и постепенно формировать навыки, которые меняют качество жизни. 🤩Тема сентября — «Саморегуляция» За этот месяц вы научитесь: — понимать сигналы своего организма; — быстрее справляться со стрессом и тревогой; — выходить из состояния постоя

15🔥9💯6

Signed Полина Калюжная

27 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC267 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Посмотрела интервью Собчак с Аксеновой за вас 🙌🏻 Любовь Аксенова — человек с устойчивой внутренней опорой. Она не играет роль сильной, но в её реакциях и словах видна зрелая психика, которая не рушится под давлением. Разберём три ключевых момента. 1️⃣ Домогательства в 17 лет: реакция «обман» вместо «замри» Знакомый отца вёз её на «Мосфильм», положил руку на ногу, а в пустом офисе начал хватать и целовать. Аксенова

23🔥13😍11

Signed Полина Калюжная

22 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC271 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Настроение мини-выходных на фестивале Архстояние в Никола-Ленивце ❤️‍🔥 Очень рекомендую к посещению сам парк. Пейзажи просто невероятные. 3 часа в пути точно стоят того

13🔥8😍5

Signed Полина Калюжная

17 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC318 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итак, обещала ответить на ваши вопросы и более развернуто обсудить эту тему. Что ищет 18-летняя девушка в «Чёрном дельфине»? Она не ищет мужа. Она ищет идеального отца — сильного, опасного, недоступного, но нуждающегося в её любви. Того, кто не уйдёт, потому что идти ему некуда. Тюрьма — это гарантия, что он не бросит. Звучит цинично, но бессознательное выбирает именно так. Её влечёт не сам Галявиев, а его чудовищ

🔥1712💯8

Signed Полина Калюжная

16 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC211 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Благодарю вас, любимые друзья, коллеги и подписчики за активное участие в обсуждение темы в постах выше 🙌🏻 Обязательно отвечу и подробнее напишу об этом в ближайшее время. А пока — рекомендовала бы к просмотру этот фильм. Это не шедевр с художественной точки зрения. Но на него точно стоит обратить внимание в контексте происходящего в социуме. Как сильно размывается понятие «нормы» и какие у этого последствия. Кто

8🔥7💯3

Signed Полина Калюжная

15 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC199 viewsread 6 August 2026

Нет слов, одни эмоции… 🔼 Очень пугает меня вся эта тюремная романтизация, начиная от безобидных шоу типа «Ждуль», заканчивая движениями «АУЕ» и историями, как в посте выше Что думаете?

Signed Полина Калюжная

15 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC203 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezposhadyPhoto

В «Чёрном дельфине» 25-летний скулшутер Ильназ Галявиев женился на 18-летней фанатке. Церемония прошла 30 июня прямо в тюрьме, где он отбывает пожизненный срок. Невеста Диана К. учится на журналиста. Она впервые увидела его в интернете в 2021 году, когда он устроил стрельбу в гимназии. Тогда погибли 7 детей и 2 учителя. @bezposhady

🤯11😱6

Signed Полина Калюжная

11 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC286 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вот такая вот casual суббота с любимейшей Ксенией Анатольевной ❤️‍🔥💔 Желаю, чтобы ваш мужчина смотрел на вас так же, как я на Собчак)) А как проходят ваши шашлыки?

14🔥10👍6

Signed Полина Калюжная

10 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC253 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Алис Миллер — «Драма одаренного ребенка в поисках собственного Я»

11👍9🔥5

Signed Полина Калюжная

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @PolinaCare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 294,774 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Полина Калюжная” (@PolinaCare), 830 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PolinaCare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.