6 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
https://t.me/Pointoview
Channel
Point Of View
@Pointoview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
952subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001270886071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pointoview |
| Description | A Channel Dedicated To The Freedom Of Speech. In These Times of Censorship, Our Voice Needs to be Heard. Share The Channel. |
| Created | 30 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pointoview |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 952 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 952 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.24%
- avg views ÷ 952 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 78.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,569 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,480
- Videos
- ≈2,000
- Links
- ≈5,510
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Canadian authorities have begun arriving at private homes to question and in some cases charge citizens over social media posts written months or even years before the law under which they are now being pursued ever existed. Under Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, Bill C-9, formally known as the Combatting Hate Act, received royal assent on June 18 and took effect on July 18. Within only a few weeks the Justic…
4 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026
File
Was MAGA a Trojan horse for the surveillance state? It’s an honest question. What if the real agenda behind Flock cameras and data centers was something so dark, so frightening, so diabolical... that most Americans would write it off as tinfoil conspiracy, or a story out of a 1980s sci-fi novel? And what if some of the men behind it are your greatest heroes? Seemingly overnight, these two issues blew up in America. Eve…
4 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
You say genocide, I say war When you're attacked, that's what the army's for Does it get ugly? You bet it does When I know you wanna kill Every last one of us Every last one of us Every last one of us You never mention October 7 Young girls raped against trees Murdered brutally For the crime of dancing You condemn the Jews, with selective memory Musicians holding flags, mouthing like sheep Propaganda fuelled by the I…
4 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
He Is Still Walking Free. How the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s mosquito-net campaign helped wipe out a cornerstone of African food security and left an entire ecosystem in ruins. Across the Cahora Bassa Delta, the critical nursery and breadbasket of the Zambezi Valley where fish populations are born and grow, the foundation flooded tribal villages with millions of ultra-fine mosquito nets meant to fight malaria…
3 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC64 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Marlene Frazier: Here's their #2030Agenda plan for us so nobody acts like you weren't warned. I worked at the place In Manchester who got the Amazon data centers contracts . Once I found out I was in the Devil's Den , I was gone. I should've thought something was off having to sign a NDA. https://t.me/Pointoview
3 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
Blue beams appear on satellite imagery just before the fires. Meanwhile, you’re encouraged to blame each other and feel guilty. Divide the public, distract from the bigger picture. They are always one step ahead. Don’t fall for it; AI is not your friend. https://t.me/Pointoview
3 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
The United Nations Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are merely the latest chapters in this ongoing saga of global domination. These initiatives, cloaked in the guise of humanitarianism and sustainability, serve as vehicles for implementing a one-world government under the control of the nobility and their papal allies. Through the UN, WEF, IMF and other globalist institutions, they have create…
3 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC72 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Conspiracies are happening every day all around us. The question is, "What are we going to do about them?" https://t.me/Pointoview
1 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
https://t.me/Pointoview
31 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026
The 1918 Influenza Epidemic Was a Vaccine - Caused Disease And The Rosenau Experiments Proved No Contagion Dr. Amandha Dawn Vollmer https://amandhavollmer.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web
30 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC109 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
Lori Fullbright On The Dangers Of Ai. https://t.me/Pointoview
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Pointoview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 875,191 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Point Of View” (@Pointoview), 952 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pointoview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.