Channel
@Podslushanoefirwood
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004309822158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Podslushanoefirwood |
| Created | 7 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Podslushanoefirwood |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 18 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 19 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 21 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 16 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 16 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
58 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 11 | 19.0% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 10.3% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 8.62% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 8.62% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
следующая в списке – Габриэла Деймон Кастро. о, эта стерва с зубками, способными прокусить чью-то шею, решила нарядиться оборотнем, как оригинально! 😒 даже я в этом костюме выглядела бы прикольнее. скучотища, 6 из 10, ожидали чего-то большего. сплетница номер два💋
👎1👏1💩1
следующая на повестке дня шарлотта янг. образ невинной девы? зай, кого ты пытаешься обмануть. решила подправить репутацию по методу рошель?) не бойся, зайка, никто не забыл твои мутки с двумя блондинами. а костюм... скука смертная. оценка 4 из 10 сплетница 1💸💸💸
🥰4🍾2👎2💩2🔥2
рошель гретель велеванте-босвен. та, о ком сейчас гудит вся академия. решила, что образ ангела спасёт твою репутацию? банально. одни сплошные перья и ничего интересного. ставлю четыре из десяти. скучно. сплетница 1💸💸
👎4🤡4❤2🔥2🥰1
ребят, у нас тут какие-то проблемки с каналом... очень грустно, мои хорошие. но вы не переживайте! сейчас мы просто найдём кого-нибудь другого, ждите, пупсики! сплетница 1💸💸
😁3🍾1🥰1
оцениваем костюмы на хеллоуин?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁1
добро пожаловать, пупсик! пусть твоё пребывание тут будет очень продуктивным🙈🐁 сплетница номер два💋💋💋
😁2
Слухами земля полнится... Добро пожаловать в Эфирвуд. В наших рядах пополнение: встречайте новую Сплетницу! Кажется, кто-то решил сменить скучные учебники на перо грифеля. Посмотрим, чьи секреты окажутся горячее)) Сплетница 1💸: Добро пожаловать!!
🍾1😁1😍1
Сплетница 1: Знаю это девочку, ничего святого в ней нет)) шлюха одним словом
💋2🔥2🏆1
а вот и вторая героиня нашего поста. Рошель Гретель Велеванте-Босвен, также известная как, цитирую, «пикмуха» и «местная куртизанка». если вы остались без её внимания, то поздравляю, либо вы женщина, либо в вас нет ничего мужского, что могло бы её зацепить. каждого парня она считает особенным и то же самое вливает ему в уши. с какой целью она это делает? хм, наверное, резиновый друг в тумбочке ей надоел и хочется н…
😁3💋1💩1🤡1
Оскар Леонардно Дженнтели. 18 лет. 30 метров от вас. Ищу папочку чтобы наказал как следует. Без обязательств. Люблю порно, хентай и охегао. Охаешечки, даттебаешечки🍒🍒💩💩. Жду в лс только мальчиков с большим членом😘😘. Женщины не писать, не интересует Фетиши: Страпон, Удушье, тентакли, Порванное очко, Золотой дождь, копрофилия, некрофилия, костюм горничной, течка, много спермы, сквирт, кормление спермой, пускание меня п…
💔5👏1🔥1😁1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Podslushanoefirwood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
оцениваем костюмы на хеллоуин?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подслушано Эфирвуд” (@Podslushanoefirwood), 18 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Podslushanoefirwood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.