Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pluton Finance Official

Channel

Pluton Finance Official

@Pluton_Finance_Official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

232subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002361926044
TypeChannel
Username@Pluton_Finance_Official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pluton_Finance_Official

Growth

232237234.57 August 2026 — 237 subscribers8 August 2026 — 237 subscribers16 August 2026 — 235 subscribers24 August 2026 — 233 subscribers1 September 2026 — 232 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 11:26232-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:43233-2
16 Aug 2026, 13:54235-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:00237no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:00237first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7237.1%
3216.5%
😁2713.9%
👍199.79%
🏆189.28%
🤔94.64%
👏84.12%
31.55%
🍾21.03%
👀21.03%
👎21.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 21 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2025, 14:39 UTC184 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Solvers #centralization: Secure until it all falls apart!

😁10👍7

19 Oct 2025, 13:38 UTC167 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Cross-Chain Volume Surge! A New Era of Institutional Adoption and Record Activity !!! Decentralized bridges have reached $63.9B in TVL (as of Oct 1, 2025) 📈, with #Ethereum leading at $11.46B in cross-chain volume, far ahead of other chains. 🔥 Meanwhile, partnerships like Chainlink, SWIFT, and UBS are expanding tokenized assets across blockchains, with cross-chain infrastructure making them more accessible and ef

8

17 Oct 2025, 12:37 UTC87 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💡 Every smart contract follows a design pattern ... Choosing the right #smart_contract design pattern is key to building scalable, secure, and upgradeable protocols. from Factory to Proxy and Modular, each solves a different architectural challenge! At #PlutonFinance, we’ve already reached the “Congratulations!” step, combining these patterns into a modular, intent-based #DeFi framework built for scalability, comp

🔥9

15 Oct 2025, 12:36 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧨 Billions Lost in Bridge Hacks, What Really Went Wrong? Bridges make #Web3 interoperable, but also expose new attack surfaces. ⚠️ Common Risks: 🧩 Smart contract flaws: Tiny bugs in bridge contracts, from reentrancy to signature validation, can let attackers forge proof of deposits or mint unbacked tokens. Most multi-million-dollar bridge hacks started with one missed require() or unchecked input. 🔑 Compromised v

🔥6

13 Oct 2025, 12:24 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

“Why juggle 5 approvals when one #intent can do it all? 💡 Single_Sign Simplicity 💥

😁3

13 Sept 2025, 14:28 UTC307 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Why Blockchains must talk to each other? ⚡️ #Interoperability ≠ just “moving tokens around.” It’s about chains exchanging state, data, and logic seamlessly! 3 main approaches: 1️⃣ Bridges → Leverage the bridge’s liquidity network to deliver assets on the destination chain. 2️⃣ Light Clients / Relays → smart contracts that verify events directly, no middlemen. 3️⃣ Cross-Chain Protocols → shared standards for nativ

🔥125👎2

10 Sept 2025, 20:38 UTC304 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Intent vs. GMP: Why Choose Intent for Cross-Chain?⚖️🤔 🧠 General Message Passing (GMP): ●Developers manage gateway contracts, nonces, ordering, retries, and out-of-gas issues on the destination chain. ●Handle relayer fees, ABI encoding/decoding, chainId mismatches, and complex finality windows, reorgs, and replay protection (nonces/IDs). ●State verification, Merkle proofs, and external oracles require constant mo

👍102

7 Sept 2025, 19:55 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

To infinity… and across chains. 🚀 Single-chain ≠ scale. Meet users where they are: multi-chain madness. #PlutonFinance

😁7

6 Sept 2025, 05:37 UTC184 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#DeFi 2025 (30 Aug): From Risk Rally to Stable Surge! TVL Growth: 📉 Stable: +58% 🚀 USDe: +315% 💵 USDC: +43% 💵 USDT: +25% 🟡 DAI/USDS: +46% 🔹 Other stables: +26% Growth compares 30 Aug vs 1 Jan 2025! Risk appetite is back! pegged assets keep stealing the spotlight, liquidity is deeper, and New entrants are rolling out across the stablecoin space. Stay updated and ahead with #Plutonfinance!

🔥4🤔3

15 Aug 2025, 10:37 UTC320 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔮 Get ready for the future of #DeFi with #PlutonFinance! Check out our roadmap for 2025-2026, featuring groundbreaking smart contracts, AI-powered chatbots, seamless wallet integrations, and much more! 🚀

🔥19🏆9

27 Jul 2025, 20:17 UTC361 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$5T+ by 2030? #Intent is the new infrastructure, scaling fast!⚡️🔥 #Interoperability #Market

🤔65👀2

24 Jul 2025, 21:55 UTC281 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 What if users never had to think about bridges, gas, or slippage again? Intents let users define what they want, not how it gets done. ERC-7683 + #Intent unlock: 🔁 One-click cross-chain swaps ⚡ Gasless execution via solvers 🌐 Liquidity aggregation (DEX, CEX, bridges) 🛡️ Lower slippage, better security Still early! Challenges like solver centralization & non-EVM gaps remain, one of the very areas #PlutonFinance i

👏4🍾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Pluton_Finance_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pluton Finance Official” (@Pluton_Finance_Official), 232 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pluton_Finance_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.