Channel
@Pluhendyu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002889572088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pluhendyu |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pluhendyu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 108 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 107 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 107 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
600 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 229 | 38.2% | |
| 🐳 | 113 | 18.8% | |
| 🍓 | 108 | 18.0% | |
| 💋 | 81 | 13.5% | |
| 🌚 | 69 | 11.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Pluhendyu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #Искра #комикс •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Две незнакомки случайно встретились в метро. . . ◖⚆ᴥ⚆◗ ↓Комикс почитать тута↓ @SparklePlushka @SparklePlushka @SparklePlushka Есчо, скоро снова будут арты по другим фандомам.... (•‿•) Надеюсь........ ༎ຶ‿༎ຶ ¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨ Info | channel | kkk
🍓11💘11💋9🌚1
ㅤ「★」Iskra「★」 #комикс #искра •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ВЫШЕЛ КОМИКС!!! АБАЛДЕТЬ, ЭТО ШТО, КОМИКС??? НЕТ, РЕБЯТ, ЭТО РЕАЛЬНО КОМИИИИКС ✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧ НУ ГДЕ ЖЕ, ГДЕ ЖЕ ЕГО ПОЧИТАТЬ? А ВОТ ЗДЕСЬ ------> t.me/SparklePlushka ЖЕЕЕСТЬ, РЕБЯТ, ОТСТРЕЛЯЛАСЬ ТАК ОТСТРЕЛЯЛАСЬ!!! (人 •͈ᴗ•͈) Так хотела вас погреть перед выпуском комикса, что аж пропала . . .на месяц ʘ‿ʘ. . . . . БЫВАЕТ? ㅤㅤЕсли что, немно…
🐳16💘9💋7
ㅤ「★」Melissa「★」 #гифт #Мелисса •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ ЫЖЫЖЭЫ??¿? (⊙_◎)(⊙_◎) ЧТО ЗА НЕДЕЛЯ ПОДАРКОВ??? ヾ(*’Ｏ’*)/ Еще и все гифты такие красивые, просто объедение!!!!!!ь!! (๑˃̵ ᴗ ˂̵)و КИРИЕШЕЧКО,, СПАСИБО ВАМ ОГРОМНОЕ ЗА ТАКОЙ КРАСИВИ АРТЕК С МОЕЙ ДЕВОЧКЙО!!!! ಠಿヮಠಠಿヮಠಠಿヮಠ скора мои пописчики будут делать контент, вместо меня. . . ◖⚆ᴥ⚆◗ (простите, рильна многа дел) https://t.me/kirie…
🌚19💘13💋11
ㅤ「★」Melissa「★」 #гифт #Мелисса •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ ЖЕСТЯК, смотрите, какой ПРЕКРАСНЫЙ АРТЕК МНЕ НАРИСОВАЛА КРАСОТОЧКА СИРОТКА ЛИЛКК!!!¡!¡!!¡!!!!! (ﾟοﾟ人))(ﾟοﾟ人))(ﾟοﾟ人)) Прошу обратить ваше внимание не только на ВЕЛИЧИЕ этого арта(Я ПОНИМАЮ, ЭТО ОЧЕНЬ СЛОЖНО) но и на то, что этот ВЕЛИКИЙ человек всё ещё помнит мою девочку Мелиссу!!¡! ◖⚆ᴥ⚆◗ Карочи, этот артек меня очень обрадовал, ОГРОМНЕЙШЕЕ …
🍓18💘11💋8
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ КАРОЧЕЕ, последний месяц я усердно занималась комиксом в тайне от вас, паралельно выпуская фандомные арты ಠಿヮಠ ㅤ15 марта комекс уже должен будет отправится под редакцию мэрии нашего города, тк я ВЫНУЖДЕНО участвую в конкурсе комиксов, где принимают участие абсолютно все учебные заведения (●´⌓`●). Как вы могли догадаться, основная тематика комикса будет про мой гор…
💘20🐳10🌚7💋3
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #pwgood #ШайнМылд #БУРГЕРКИНГДОБАВЬТЕПУГБУРГЕРЫ •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Пвбургер. . . Пургер. . . Пугбургер. . .? ⊙﹏⊙ К сожалению, пока не позволяют обстоятельства рисовать полноценные арты, поэтому, предлагаю вам посмотреть на омериканские бергеры. . . (ㆁωㆁ) Кстати, говоря о бергерах, можете оценить ноябрьского Джонобургера, посмотрим, насколько сильно я продвинулась в рисовани…
💘29💋14🍓12🌚1
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #Рин #Лололошка #Мастерская47 •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Быстрыи рисунак с Рин ෆ╹ .̮ ╹ෆ Попозже хочется придумать ей тоже какое-нибудь оружие. . . (〃ﾟ3ﾟ〃) ¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨ Info | commission | hz
🍓27💘17💋16🐳2🌚1
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #линчфд #арт #леч #жон •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ ° 。«Последнее признание» 。° ЕЕЕЕ это моя первая ПОЛНОЦЕНКА по Линчу с самим Линчем(ㆁωㆁ) щтооо. . . Два фота потому што не смогла определится с освещением, кабута с ним и без него два разных вайбика (~￣³￣)~ tw: немножка крови ¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨ Info | commission | hz
💘29🐳13💋8🍓1
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #Иветт #Айтор #Мастерская47 #Лололошка #арт •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Еще раз рисую Эйдосовый посох, но штоби расписать анкету оружию постом выше. . . Может вас заинтересуют мои размышления (人 •͈ᴗ•͈) не скринжуйтесь только ʘ‿ʘ. . . А ЕЩЕ!! СПАСИБО ВАМ ВСЕМ ОГРОМНОЕ ЗА ЗВЕЗДАЧКИ И ПОДАРКИ!!Ь! в который раз диву даюсь, насколько сильно вы любите меня закидать подарками!!! (๑°꒵°๑)･*♡ оч благо…
🍓27💘17🐳12🌚2
#думаю #думаю #думаю #щп? •´¨•.¸¸.•´¨•.¸¸.•´¨•.¸ Чтобы создать анкету оружию, которое, чисто в теории, могло бы существовать в мастерской 47, я почитала, чем (возможно) вдохновлялись сценаристы лололошки при создании Эйдоса. Наконец я придумала, какое оружие можно с ним сделать <(￣︶￣)> ОРУЖИЕ МАССОВОГО КОНТРОЛЯ СОЗНАНИЯ, ЕЕЕ ｡◕‿◕｡ Краткая историческая справка (это нужно, чтобы вы поняли, к чему тут идея): пон…
💘17🍓9🐳8
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #Иветт #Лололошка #Мастерская47 #шпешка #скетч •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Рандомные скетчы с Иветт, захотелось сделать ей оружие с эйдосами (ʃƪ＾3＾) В среду выхожу из реста, птмчт уже с кайфом отдохнула (~￣³￣)~ надеюсь, что за это время вы не забыли меня ¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨ Info | commission | hz
🐳23💘19🌚18🍓3
ㅤ「★」New post「★」 #рест •*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸.•*´¨*•.¸¸ Плюшка - В С Ё!!! Плюшка объелась оливье на нг и тепер на две недели (+-) уходит в рест ⊙﹏⊙ На самом деле, стала замечать, что почутчут выгораю, не приходит никаких идей для новых рисунаков, да и мои рисунаки в целом мне перестали нравитца (˘･_･˘) ЕЕЕХ, простите все, каво я набрала в мьюшечко и прям ща ухожу в рест. . . •́ …
🐳18💘15🌚10💋3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Pluhendyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 547,072 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Pluhendyu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌀(◎_⊙)плюшка(⊙_◎)🌀” (@Pluhendyu), 108 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pluhendyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.