Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Platinum Ticket 💸

Channel

Platinum Ticket 💸

@Platinum_Ticket_Group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

117subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002244276281
TypeChannel
Username@Platinum_Ticket_Group
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Platinum_Ticket_Group

Growth

1171191187 August 2026 — 119 subscribers8 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers15 August 2026 — 117 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:05117-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:46118no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:34118-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:00119first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 117 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.4
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (4 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total526
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁250.0%
😭125.0%
🥴125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁1

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/i/status/2084909028564464053

😁1

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

4 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @OHUENKOchatPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

3 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC78 viewsread 9 August 2026

Улучшения на первомайские подарки? 🤔

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

3 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026

🏆

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

2 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026

looool imagine telegram does airdrop for birthday to all gram wallets you are not ready

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

2 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @telelakel

💎 Telegram Beta for iOS v12.9.3 (34530) begins integrating a built-in TON (Gram) wallet into the app. A new MTProto layer for TON has also appeared. It routes requests to TON Center through Telegram's servers, with responses returned to the client as JSON. Unlike the current Wallet, which operates as a Mini App, the upcoming TON (Gram) wallet will be integrated directly into the Telegram client. @telelakel | #new_

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

28 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wllwallPhoto

🕶 Today, Pavel Durov purchased Project Mayhem with a black background on the marketplace for 5,500 💎(~$8,000). The glasses were then sent to the owner’s main Telegram channel.

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

21 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026

🌍 This summer will see the largest rollout of a non-custodial crypto wallet in human history. ⚡️Instant zero-fee crypto transactions for over a billion users are about to become reality. 💎 We're bringing a native non-custodial Gram wallet to every Telegram app! 🏳️

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

16 Jul 2026, 22:59 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

☠️ СТИКЕРЫ УМЕРЛИ: ГОЯМ ПРОСЬБА РАЗОЙТИСЬ ПО ДОМАМ @mrkt приостанавливает торговлю стикерами. Всем дали время до 17 июля вывести свои фантики с обезьянками и пингвинчиками. Дальше поддержки нет. Очередной проект Саши доехал до логичного финала: Notcoin Not Pixel BUILD Sticker Store Достойная коллекция. Человек с завидной стабильностью выпускает продукт, собирает хайп и ликвидность с комьюнити, а через год от проек

😭1

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

11 Jul 2026, 22:44 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

most likely next successful business coming from topblast.lol intel maps is already one of the main topics in trenches and simply said - direct competitor to bubblemaps with its own twist intel maps covers not only jettons but nfts and telegram gifts real-time holder mapping, cabal filters, kol tracking, ai powered, multi-chain supported, insights and alphas, investigations and more intel maps is solving huge pro

🥴1

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

11 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC112 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нуу

Signed ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕦𝕞 𝕋𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕥

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Platinum_Ticket_Group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Platinum Ticket 💸” (@Platinum_Ticket_Group), 117 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Platinum_Ticket_Group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.