Channel
@PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002727474123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession |
| Description | Бот для тейков — @PGBT_bot Время выкладки тейков 8:00-1:00 ПО МСК. Все тейки анонимны (прем эмодзи НЕ РАБОТАЮТ). |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 95 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
196 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 63 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 29.6% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 9.18% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 5.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 4.08% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 3.57% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.55% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌#take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ Простите, наверное, лезу не в своей дело, но меня триггерят вп в пгб кф, я понимаю, что большинству поебать и что это просто работа, и я понимаю, если бы там редко просто нсфв бы кидали, но блять, почему самые конченные вп я вижу только в пгб кф. :( ⤵️ Анон
👀6❤4
📌#take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ меня триггерит такой шип. как глорипицца (говорю как хейтер омегаверс эллиота). также меня бесит, что МНОГИЕ художники делают из пицца гая босса стероидов
❤🔥7
📌#take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ меня триггерит это фото ⤵️ неанон Иллюмина
❤10
📌 #take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ продолжение к моему прошлому посту ну лан, может мне чуть нравится как его рисуют. Но чтоб прям огроменые это пиздец. Мне больше такой вариант нравится ⤵️ неанон Иллюмина
❤6💘3
📌 #take❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ Меня пугает тот факт что шипперят Пицца Гая и Мафиозо (из Форсакена)... Ну... Почему их шипперят..😰 не так много шипов Пицца Гая × Филипп, как с этим жёлтым, мне страшно... Но спасибо что рисовка прикольная 😭😭
💘6🤝2
📌#take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ мне не нравится то что Пицца Гаю рисуют огромную грудь, ну серьёзно, я знаю что она по канону большая, но зачем рисовать такую огромную 💔 ещё мне не нравятся гл*рипицца, простите
💘9
📌 #take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ Простите но меня чуть-чуть триггерят челы, которые приходят в пиццу гейм и говорят "ПОЧЕМУ ФИЛИПП ТАКОЙ ТЯЖЁЛЫЙ/ НЕ МОГУ ПРОЙТИ ФИЛИППА ДЕНЬ 159484((" . Это не относится к челам которые с телефона играют. Просто бля, игрок заходит на 15 минут, играет, не понимает, как устроена игра, не хочет тратить время на то, чтобы разобраться и сразу говорит мол это пиздец а не игрушка, ну и что это так…
🤔5🎉1👎1💘1
📌 #take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ простите, но меня уже задрали фанаты ультракилла. по моему не обязательно под каждым видио или постом с пгб писать что ультракилл лучше и нам стоит в него поиграть. если че против самого ультракилла ничего против не имею, мне даже нравится сама игра всё
🤝6💘5❤2
Video, posted without a caption
💘2❤1🎉1
Photo, posted without a caption
💘7❤2
📌 #take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ сука удалите дивайнов уже. легко контрятся, но они как назойливые мухи. всё
💘7❤2
📌#take ❗️❗️🔣@PGBT_bot🔣 ↪ Я ненавижу демона Висаджа, хуйло тупое, гори в аду мразь, хочу чтоб Брюс и его сынуля были счастливы 😭😭 ⤵️ (Морико, главный хецтер пгб🥀)
❤6💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 469,273 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PGBTrigger Confession” (@PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession), 95 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PizzaGameBetaTriggerConfession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.