🐾 ¡Nos veremos allí! 😊
custom 53215027607875178657

Channel
@PixPawFur
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002595306786 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PixPawFur |
| Description | ¡Somos @denzshka y @Lgames_arts , Fomentamos la creatividad de nuestros productos a mejor calidad de argentina! ⭐ ¡Siempre dispuestos a mostrar lo mejor con total confianza para nuestros clientes y nuestro aporte a la comunidad furry & demás comunidades! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PixPawFur |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 142 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 142 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (19 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,579 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5321502760787517865 | 79 | 82.3% | |
| custom 5321367752785534724 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5321156066732417198 | 6 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5321335626430160095 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5318765225942459425 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5319174944347661375 | 1 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐾 ¡Nos veremos allí! 😊
custom 53215027607875178657
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53215027607875178655
🐾 Anuncio. 🥁 1. Más productos nuevos innovadores & originales. 👑 Estamos trabajando con todo en ello y nos enorgullece decir para a finales de septiembre, tengamos mucho contenido nuevo y productos distintos. 🔥 2. Canal nuevo dedicado al público adulto y productos +18. 😓 Sabía que esto iba a pasar. . . ¡Peeeero tenemos novedades! Quizás no sea nuestro plan este año, pero posiblemente para 2027, estaremos trabajando…
🐾 More acrilycs. Digital circus. 🚩 Finalizamos los acrílicos del increíble digital circus! 🥁 ¿Que saga deberíamos de hacer a partir de ahora que la audiencia les guste? ♾ Créditos al artista: @SAPcristal <<
custom 53215027607875178653
>> créditos al colaborador <<
custom 53215027607875178651
🐾 " Puede parecer inutil, pero no lo es. No mientras tengas gente que te ama. Los recuerdos bonitos valen mucho. Aprécialos. Y también a la gente que te rodean. No sabes cuándo se irán... " 🏆 Nuevos 2 prints. >> Créditos al colaborador <<
custom 53215027607875178654custom 53191749443476613751
🚩 Más llaveros de acrílicos by @Nixthecat 😝 Estaremos haciendo más llaveros de distintos juegos, personajes furrys y animes! >> Canal del artista colaborador <<
custom 53215027607875178658custom 53213677527855347241
🚩 Llaveros de acrílicos by @Nixthecat 🥁 ¿Quieres un llavero de acrílico con tu personaje favorito? Es tu momento. 🌟 >> Canal del artista colaborador.
custom 53215027607875178656custom 53213677527855347242
🐾 Anuncio importante. 😔 Sabemos mucho que nosotros, argentinos, somos aficionados a nuestra cultura, y más por el fútbol. ¡Pero no es una derrota! Llegamos a los finales 2 veces consecutiva y eso es un enorme logro que difícilmente se repetirá para cualquier equipo. Hay que festejarlo igualmente aunque no surge un mayor impacto como nos hubiera gustado ganar. 🪙 No siempre se gana. Lo mejor que uno puede hacer al pe…
custom 532150276078751786511
🐾 Anuncio. 🤟 - A partir de agosto, empezaremos a buscar y tener merch temática de anime. así que posiblemente nos vean en alguna que otra feria anime por allí. ☺️ 🤟 - el 19/7, participamos en la feria mercantil furry, tardefurs edicion IV. y el 14/11, howlfest (posiblemente tambien vendamos en el howlmarket). otra edición furry! 🤟 - A partir de mañana empezaremos estar activamente en todas las redes, actualizacióne…
custom 53213677527855347244
🐾 upsi. 😳 no vieron nada 🙂
custom 53211560667324171984
🐾 Vacaciones. >> Tras un largo descanso, volvemos a retomar. ✨ Hora de trabajar. 😳 Oigan... Quienes fueron los cochinos que votaron por un contenido +18
custom 53211560667324171982
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PixPawFur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 141,449 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PixPaw” (@PixPawFur), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PixPawFur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.