Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𐌿ᥙ᧘ᥙᴦρᥙⲙ ᥰ᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲⲙ | P᧐ᥒy T᧐ᥕᥒ |⚡

@Pilgrimponytown

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520375417
TypeChannel
Username@Pilgrimponytown
Description- ʙ ϶ᴛ᧐ⲙ ᴛᴦκ ʙы ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ уᤋнᥲᴛь ᥰρ᧐ ⲙн᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛы, ᥰᥙ᧘ᥙᴦρᥙⲙ ʙᥲⲙ ρᥲᥴᥴκᥲжᥱᴛ ᥙ ʙ᧐ᤋⲙ᧐жн᧐ ᤋᥲᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴуᥱᴛ ʙᥲᥴ ᥙⲙᥙ⚡💫 - 𐌿᧐ ʙᥲжныⲙ ʙ᧐ᥰρ᧐ᥴᥲⲙ ᥙ дρуᴦᥙⲙ ᥰρᥱд᧘᧐жᥱнᥙяⲙ ᥴюдᥲ : ̗̀➛ @PilgrimPonyTown_bot - дᥲᴛᥲ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲнᥙя ᴛᴦκ — 15.08.25.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Pilgrimponytown

Growth

4510 Aug 2026, 06:55 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:16 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 06:5510 Aug 2026, 15:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:1645no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:5545first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.0%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,008
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
89
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1322.8%
🔥915.8%
🥰814.0%
❤‍🔥610.5%
💊610.5%
😨47.02%
👍35.26%
😁35.26%
👏23.51%
🕊23.51%
11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь 2 дня . . . {я уже сам боюсь}

1

8 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь 3 дня . . .

1👏1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь 4 дня . . .

1🔥1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— БУ! я ᥴн᧐ʙᥲ ᴛуᴛ, ну κᥲκ ʙы? дᥱ᧘ᥲ κᥲκ? д᧐ нᥲчᥲ᧘ᥲ ᴛуρнᥙρᥲ 𐌺᧐𐋏ᥱᥣᥣ ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь 5 днᥱᥔ! А ᴛᥲκжᥱ у ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲ E𑀥 ᥴκ᧐ρ᧐ ᴦ᧐д᧐ʙщᥙнᥲ 3 ᴦ᧐дᥙκᥲ!

👍31🔥1🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— чᴛ᧐ ж, ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ ʙ᧐ᥰρ᧐ᥴнᥙκ! ᥰ᧐д ϶ᴛᥙⲙ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ⲙ, ʙы ᧐ɸᥙцᥙᥲ᧘ьн᧐ ᤋᥲдᥲᥱᴛᥱ ʙ᧐ᥰρ᧐ᥴ нᥲᥰρяⲙую ᥲʙᴛ᧐ρу. Эᴛ᧐ ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ κᥲᥴᥲᴛьᥴя κᥲκ ρᥲδ᧐ᴛы нᥲд ᴛᴦκ ᥙ δудущᥙⲙᥙ ᥰ᧘юɯκᥲⲙᥙ, ᴛᥲκ ᥙ дρуᴦᥙⲙᥙ ⲙᥱ᧘᧐чᥲⲙᥙ. 𐌑᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ᥴⲙᥱ᧘᧐ ᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛь ʙᥴᥱ чᴛ᧐ ʙᥲᥴ ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴуᥱᴛ:) P.𐍃. ᧐чᥱнь нᥲдᥱюᥴь, чᴛ᧐ ᥊᧐ᴛь чᴛ᧐ ᴛ᧐ ᥴᥰρ᧐ᥴᥙᴛᥱ, ⲙнᥱ ᥰρᥲʙдᥲ ϶ᴛ᧐ ʙᥲжн᧐ ᥙ ᧐ᴛʙᥱᴛᥙᴛь ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛᥲρᥲюᥴь ᥴρᥲᤋу, ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ нᥱ ᥰ᧐дʙᥱдёᴛ ᥴᥱᴛь.

👏1🥰1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026

— хм.. интересное мнение сторон разошлось

30 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— да начнутся голодные игры голосования

❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

— ᥲ.. ᥙ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘ᥙ δы уᥴᴛρ᧐ᥙᴛь κᥲκ ⲙᥙнᥙ ʙᥙκᴛ᧐ρᥙну ᥲʙᴛ᧐ρу ᴛᴦκ?

  1. дᥲдᥲдᥲ!73%
  2. нᥱᴛ, ϶ᴛ᧐ нᥱ ᧐чᥱнь ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴн᧐0%
  3. ну . . . нᥱ ᤋнᥲю40%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— кстати . . . а вы знали, что скоро годовщина нашего тгк? Да, он был вне работы 95% времени сей года, но все же, открытие у него было почти год назад, как думаете, что вас будет ждать? Плюшки? Или что то новенькое? 🌙

🔥31🥰1

30 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— официально, ссылки все вставлены и действительны, также список будет пополняться

🔥1🕊1🥰1

30 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— простите, котятки, что оставил вас одних, но грядет время перемен.А я как пилигрим исчезну работать над обновлением, а также немного отхожу из за сети, но не опускаем руки, по возможности буду радовать вас плюшками

❤‍🔥1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Pilgrimponytown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

— ᥲ.. ᥙ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘ᥙ δы уᥴᴛρ᧐ᥙᴛь κᥲκ ⲙᥙнᥙ ʙᥙκᴛ᧐ρᥙну ᥲʙᴛ᧐ρу ᴛᴦκ?

  1. дᥲдᥲдᥲ!73%
  2. нᥱᴛ, ϶ᴛ᧐ нᥱ ᧐чᥱнь ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴн᧐0%
  3. ну . . . нᥱ ᤋнᥲю40%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,015,893 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

𝐅𝐀𝐕 | 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐞𝐬' 𝐕𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫
@fav_aces · 247
2 posts
𝒜𝒸𝒶𝒹ℯ𝓂𝓎 ℴ𝒻 𝒟𝓇𝒶ℊℴ𝓃 | 𝑨𝒐𝑫 𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒚 𝒕𝒐𝒘𝒏` 🔥
@AcademyOfDragon_pt_Offcial · 143
1 post
ᴛʜᴇ ꜰᴏᴜʀ sɪᴅᴇs ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀʀᴄᴇʟ `` ɪɴꜰᴏʀᴍᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ. . .
@childrenfSoA · 85
1 post
FW || Forgotten Wanderers
@clanFW · 135
1 post
⊂·•𝘾𝙤𝙉𝙇•·⊃ - 𝑪𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝒐𝑓 𝑵𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑳𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠.⋆
@CoNL_pt · 184
1 post
✧•𝐂𝐒𝐂 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎||’»𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙲𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚂𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚘𝚜
@CSCTGK · 68
1 post
𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖 -•[𝘿𝙖𝙆]•-𝘿𝙖𝙧𝙠 𝙆𝙣𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨
@Dark_Knights_klan · 365
1 post
𖤓 ݁𖥔‧₊⤷«𝐄𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐰 𝐎𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐧» „𝐄𝐨𝐒𝐎” ⋅˖ ݁𖥔⁺‧₊☽
@Empire_EoSO · 438
1 post
•♛The Abyss ED♛•
@Empire_Galaxies · 234
1 post
EWU | Safe Russian #3 | PONY TOWN
@EWUproject · 98
1 post
๋࣭ ࣪ ⤹ ♰ .𝙶𝙷𝙾𝚂𝚃𝙱𝚄𝚂𝚃𝙴𝚁𝚂.𝙸𝙽𝙵𝙾 ˊˎ-
@GHOSTBUSTERS_PT · 184
1 post
Gⵟⵎ | info ⊙︎ Guardians of the Eternal Chronos
@Got_EC · 228
1 post
-Hell’s own Heaven-
@hells_own_heaven · 119
1 post
𝗘𝗧𝗖 — 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗱'𝘀
@info_ETC · 49
1 post
𝐊𝐕𝐋 :: 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐲 𝐓𝐨𝐰𝐧 :: #2𝑹𝒖𝒔𝒔.
@KVLProject · 317
1 post
≪ 𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜 • 𝐿𝐾𝑎𝑀 ≫
@LKaM_info · 89
1 post
Уголок MoRG | Minions of the Reunited Gods | ЗАКРЫТО
@morgamecpt · 88
1 post
𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙚 𝙊𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧
@ONighspire · 70
1 post
▿ 𝙸𝚗𝚏𝚘 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚕 ▿ [ 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤: 𝐉𝐘𝐒 ]
@Outbreak_JYS · 404
1 post
◤SotFU◥ Saviors of the Fading Universe - Спасители угасающей Вселенной
@SotFUproject · 220
1 post
``TaG`` The ashen Guard [инфо канал > новости]
@TaG_infos · 174
1 post
𝐓𝐃𝐀 »la troupe du dernier acte»🎭
@TDAInf0 · 99
1 post
🪼𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑼𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒘𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑲𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒅𝒐𝒎 [TUK]
@TUKinf · 73
1 post
«𝑿𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒏»
@xotfpt · 45
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𐌿ᥙ᧘ᥙᴦρᥙⲙ ᥰ᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲⲙ | P᧐ᥒy T᧐ᥕᥒ |⚡” (@Pilgrimponytown), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pilgrimponytown.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.