Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 67 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 184β193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 01:38
185
-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:07
186
-1
22 Aug 2026, 23:48
187
-3
16 Aug 2026, 01:43
190
-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:50
192
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:30
192
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 October 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
15
32.6%
β€
14
30.4%
π₯°
9
19.6%
π₯
5
10.9%
π
2
4.35%
β‘
1
2.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2023 to 13 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pika Main π» pinned Β«$0xSnAI Aped a bag here https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xFE82E2918739627dDE8d5829C2c794e7f1d1FC93 90k https://t.me/OxSnipeProAi Nfa dyorΒ»
$0xSnAI
Aped a bag here
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xFE82E2918739627dDE8d5829C2c794e7f1d1FC93
90k
https://t.me/OxSnipeProAi
Nfa dyor
Pika Main π» pinned Β«Get ready to launch with Genesys πΉ! This blockchain project is on a trajectory to the moon, with its wallet already live and the testnet buzzing. The countdown has begun, with the mainnet launch just 2 days away! π I've joined the mission, so let's ride thisβ¦Β»
Get ready to launch with Genesys πΉ! This blockchain project is on a trajectory to the moon, with its wallet already live and the testnet buzzing. The countdown has begun, with the mainnet launch just 2 days away! π I've joined the mission, so let's ride this wave together.
Check out the details:
Website π: https://genesyscode.io/
Chart π±: https://www.dexview.com/eth/0xcf45e6a1f9af293ba4c13949fc1b5a39f6f4a0c9
Telegraβ¦
Pika Main π» pinned Β«HOGE Pre-calling this one from a safe team Join tg for now and check websites and tweet. HOGE is not just a token; it's a revolution in the ERC space. With a community-driven approach and a commitment to innovation, HOGE is making waves and you don't wantβ¦Β»
HOGE
Pre-calling this one from a safe team
Join tg for now and check
websites and tweet.
HOGE is not just a token; it's a revolution in the ERC space. With a community-driven approach and a commitment to innovation, HOGE is making waves and you don't want to miss out.
π Website: Dive deep into the world of HOGE and discover what sets us apart at [HOGE ERC](https://www.hogeerc.com).
π¦ Twitter Updates: Stay up-to-β¦
Wallpaper Community | BEP20
Just went Live
Locked and Ownership renounced thick Liq
Safe team and Dev behind
gamble it for now
Let's see how this goes
Community just started building up and creating the new bsc hyped coin. DYOR
1kmcap now
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xa025afb67bbee5fa182292bc422c86bd9b568ff6
https://t.me/wallpaperbsc
OFFICIAL CA : 0xa025afb67bbee5fa182292bc422c86bd9b568ff6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PikaMicrocap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@PikaMicrocap named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@hoge_erc named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
@wallpaperbsc named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPika Main π»β (@PikaMicrocap), 185 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PikaMicrocap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.