Channel
@Phyrex_Nii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
514subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002203333820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Phyrex_Nii |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Phyrex_Nii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 514 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 513 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 512 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 512 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 221 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Phyrex 2026-08-08 03:08： 美国在最新一轮对伊朗制裁中瞄准总部位于迪拜的加密货币交易所 美国财政部表示，已制裁一家总部位于迪拜的大型加密货币交易所及其创始人，指控他们为伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队（IRGC）及其他伊朗政府相关人士洗钱。 美国财政部表示，这家名为 Shelbit 的受制裁加密货币交易所及其创始人，旅居海外的伊朗人 Siavash Kayvanpour 是支持非法数字货币活动的跨国企业网络的组成部分。 美国财政部还表示，其制裁了总部位于伊朗的数字资产交易所 Aban Tether，指责该交易所处理了涉及此前已被指定的伊朗数字资产交易所的价值数百万美元的交易。 此外，美国财政部宣布制裁其他几家总部位于迪拜的兑换机构，指控它们帮助伊朗银行非法转移资金。 美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特在一份声明中表示：“财政部将追查并瓦解维持该政权运转的非法金融网络。” Phyrex 回复： 根据路透社的报道，美国将在伊朗与阿…
今天非农的结果出来了，美国劳动力市场出乎意料的疲软，又有不是少的投资者开始预期美国经济衰退了，而衰退就意味着可能会降息，当然从现在的局面来看并不是直接降息，而是减少加息的概率，结果市场一片欢腾，这就是典型的丧事喜办，但我仍然觉得非农数据的影响不会太久。 因为 7月 就业下降很大一部分来自地方政府教育岗位减少5万人，政府就业整体减少5.3万人，剔除政府部门以后，私人就业仍然增加3万人，医疗、建筑和制造业也继续增加岗位。夏季教育岗位的季节性波动比较大，部分减少的岗位可能在 8月 重新回来。 所以我认为，这份数据说明美国劳动力市场正在继续降温，但还没有到崩溃的程度。接下来市场很快会重新把注意力放到通胀数据上，如果下周的 CPI 仍然偏高，今天被压低的加息预期随时可能重新回来。对现在的美联储来说，就业疲软可以降低加息的紧迫性，却未必足以改变政策方向。 当然我也不认为今年会加息，只要霍尔木兹的问题解决，大概率今年就是这么维持利率不变…
Photo, posted without a caption
Phyrex 2026-08-07 00:59： 😂虽然我想相信川普说的是事实，但这么久以后，我觉得判断的唯一标准就是霍尔木兹海峡的通畅情况，如果通畅了就是川普说的实话，如果仍然不通畅那就是伊朗说的实话，屡试不爽。 @Gate Crypto、美股、港股、韩股、黄金、CFD、预测市场一站交易 https://t.co/NdCjiNw1yw Phyrex 回复： 美国在最新一轮对伊朗制裁中瞄准总部位于迪拜的加密货币交易所 美国财政部表示，已制裁一家总部位于迪拜的大型加密货币交易所及其创始人，指控他们为伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队（IRGC）及其他伊朗政府相关人士洗钱。 美国财政部表示，这家名为 Shelbit 的受制裁加密货币交易所及其创始人，旅居海外的伊朗人 Siavash Kayvanpour 是支持非法数字货币活动的跨国企业网络的组成部分。 美国财政部还表示，其制裁了总部位于伊朗的数字资产交易所 Aban Tether，指责该…
纯属运气，下午接花栗鼠之前，我做空 ADR 还是亏将近 20% 的，当时就是打算纯赌了，结果到了下午 145 美元的空单吃到了，我还在考虑是不是止损的时候 ADR 持续下跌。 喜闻乐见的继续拿着，结果一拿就到了刚才，然后发现 ADR 从 134 有反弹的意思，早晨吃过亏了，到现在已经快 50% 了，两天的饭钱都有了，还要什么自行车，直接在 136 平仓了。 接下来涨成什么样或者跌成什么样和我都没关系了，剩下的就是看明天早晨了，每天我的 SKHYUSDT 都不会过夜，今天早点平仓也能早点休息。 @Gate Crypto、美股、港股、韩股、黄金、CFD、预测市场一站交易
Phyrex 2026-08-07 21:00： 无意中看到这段视频想起前几天一个北方大哥和我说，现在的年轻人太可怕了，他们小时候虽然也不是好孩子，但往往人越多越打不起来，在公众场合还是挺敬畏的，而且都挺克制，很少有带锐利凶器的，拿根棒子就很厉害了，即便是上技校的都不希望被找到学校。 而现在“局部地区”社会上的年轻人一言不合就动手，往往下手还特别狠，每一拳都冲着头冲着眼睛去，要么就是踢下体，个别随时就能从口袋里掏出一把折叠刀，最可怕的是捅完就和没事人一样，不是去打台球就是去唱歌。 大哥还说他自己走路路过学校的时候都低着头走，不小心碰到人特别利索的道歉，被人问候父母也陪笑。这帮年轻人自己也知道，没有满 16 岁就没事，人越多胆子越大，很多年轻人都以捅过人，进去过为荣，越是这样的，越有小姑娘喜欢。 小姑娘就更不说了，某些地级城市妇科医院已经是病患越来越年轻，小姑娘本身也越来越无所谓，短视频里看到的精神小伙和活力小妹看上去人畜无害，但…
泰国确认加密货币资本利得免税，政策持续至 2029 年底 泰国正式实施针对数字资产的个人所得税优惠政策。按照相关规定，个人通过泰国依法持牌的加密货币交易所、经纪商或交易商出售 Bitcoin、其他加密货币及数字代币取得的资本利得，可免征个人所得税。 该政策适用于 2025年1月1日至 2029年12月31日。 不过，这并不意味着泰国所有加密货币收益都永久免税。海外交易所（普通个人所得税最高35%）、DEX、OTC，以及挖矿、Staking、空投等收入是否适用，需要按照具体税务规则单独判断。
距离13岁还有一个月的时间，花栗鼠🐿️解锁了独自一人从 新加坡-上海-新加坡 行程的成就。我在他这个岁数的时候连飞机都没坐过，不过我大概10岁的时候就解锁了自己坐绿皮火车的成就。
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
没想到还有挺多小伙伴感兴趣的，我不认为加息是因为从去年 12月 到今年 3月 ，即便是鲍威尔时期都没有认真考虑过加息问题，虽然3月已经开始美国和伊朗的战争了，但美联储当时还是认为战争是短期的，所以并没有将加息作为首选项，甚至都不是必选项。 目前市场传出的加息呼声，甚至是美联储官员的，当然我觉得库克不算，库克完全就是为了恶心川普，其他人应该都是受到油价上涨的影响，但真到投票的时候，反而人不多。 比如在上个月七月的会议上，油价就挺高了，但投票加息的只有三位票委，而这才一周多的时间油价就下来了，甚至还有继续下行的空间，一旦油价问题解决，在不牵扯新的问题情况下，通胀下降是大概率的，那么美联储更没有意义降息了。 所以我个人的观点是，只要川普不闹妖，大概率 2026年不会加息的。 @Gate Crypto、美股、港股、韩股、黄金、CFD、预测市场一站交易
不必等周一，7x24小时都能交易。就在 @binance
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Phyrex_Nii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,145,526 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Phyrex_Nii named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Phyrex_Ni 倪森” (@Phyrex_Nii), 514 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phyrex_Nii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.