Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PhotoDoc

@Photo_Dkth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

262subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002333985296
TypeChannel
Username@Photo_Dkth
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Photo_Dkth

Growth

2628 Aug 2026, 11:18 — 262 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 262 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:188 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 261–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:01262no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:18262first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 262 subscribers
Avg views / post
190
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held17 (4 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,707
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53710466602458280005226.7%
🔥3517.9%
💯2311.8%
2110.8%
🥰147.18%
😭115.64%
custom 5282943777059644742105.13%
🌚105.13%
custom 538220522150404194563.08%
custom 538230829212920231931.54%
👏31.54%
😱31.54%
🤔21.03%
custom 632576224025536253610.513%
❤‍🔥10.513%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC99 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💯5custom 53710466602458280003custom 53823082921292023191

30 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC100 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Памятка для косплееров на кранче - на заметку

custom 53710466602458280008custom 52829437770596447422custom 53823082921292023191

24 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC195 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как адепт репортажной съемки я не уважаю личные границы людей и без лишних вопросов снимаю всё что вижу. Так ведь можно и момент проебать 😈

custom 537104666024582800013custom 53822052215040419453💯1

20 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC264 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как всегда на просторах косплея суета, а я вот вам предлагаю посмотреть на батон белого и её сухариков которые только сегодня появились ❤️🥺 Такое мы репостим ⠀

🔥11😭11custom 53822052215040419453

18 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC260 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 537104666024582800013

18 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTCviews —2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53710466602458280002

18 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC208 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Произошла так называемая замена эмодзи на реакции, а также у вас частично отобрали некую свободу выбора - живите с этим, 26й год. А ещё у меня кончились бусты на канале и поэтому кастомов всего 5 😁

custom 53710466602458280008custom 53823082921292023191

16 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC228 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вы посмотрите в этот полный разочарования взгляд После такого игрок обязан извиниться за свои действия, удалить игру вместе с аккаунтом и забыть про эту франшизу

💯10custom 53710466602458280001

15 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC208 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Объявляю новый апдейт ТГ официальной возможностью сформировать свою собственную ОПГ (которых боялись даже чеченцы Сорок Сорок)

🥰6custom 53710466602458280001

14 Jul 2026, 05:12 UTC213 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пока что мой канал становится популярным только у ботов, спамящих разную херню. Но делают они это почему-то с утра пораньше и вы этого не видите 😁

🌚10😱31custom 53710466602458280001

12 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC259 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пару минут назад мне любезно напомнили, что вообще-то сегодня профессиональный день. С праздником всех причастных (а они тут есть) получается 📷 Хорошая попытка, но я не буду открывать домашний бар

🔥164👏3❤‍🔥1custom 53710466602458280001

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Photo_Dkth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 989,189 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PhotoDoc” (@Photo_Dkth), 262 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Photo_Dkth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.