Theory of natural selection was given by
- Lamarck16%
- Oparin and Haldane20%
- Charles Darwin58%
- Alfred Wallace6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@Phoenixfedlogs_v35
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001554118772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Phoenixfedlogs_v35 |
| Description | Welcome To PHOENIX FED V35 Our Tag - โโฌ-๐พ๐๐พ-โฌโ About Phoenix Feds - @Phoenix_empire Founder - @Phoenixwarmed Fed owner - @ftdrgaba Fed Appeal Group - @Phoenix_f3d_v35 Our Hub - @CFChub |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 11 November 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Phoenixfedlogs_v35 |
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/6611 Nov 2021, 05:54 UTC | @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/74 ยท this entry11 Nov 2021, 06:13 UTC | 1.00 | 19 minutes |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/76 ยท this entry19 Nov 2021, 21:24 UTC | @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/6819 Nov 2021, 21:30 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/77 ยท this entry20 Nov 2021, 11:26 UTC | @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/6920 Nov 2021, 11:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/79 ยท this entry10 Dec 2021, 03:50 UTC | @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/7110 Dec 2021, 03:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/80 ยท this entry14 Dec 2021, 06:46 UTC | @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/7214 Dec 2021, 06:47 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v35/82 ยท this entry25 Dec 2021, 04:30 UTC | @phoenixf3dlogs_v39/7425 Dec 2021, 04:34 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @phoenixf3dlogs_v39 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9โ1) |
| @phoenixf3dlogs_v19 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @phoenixf3dlogs_v19 (8โ1) |
| @phoenixfedlogs_v22 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @phoenixfedlogs_v22 (4โ1) |
| @Phoenixfedlogs_v28 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @Phoenixfedlogs_v28 (5โ0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 November 2021 to 8 February 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Phoenixfedlogs_v28. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy ยท clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โFirstโ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โForwarded fromโ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 2 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2021 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 14 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Theory of natural selection was given by
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โ๏ธ Order #5 ๐๐ป Order Given By - @kiraxophunter ๐๐ป Made By - @PhoenixWarmed Order status - complete โ PLS JOIN ๐๐๐ โโโ @CFC_GRAPHICS โโโ
Video, posted without a caption
โ๏ธ IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION WE CREATED NEW SUPPORT GROUP OF CFC OLD ONE IS SOLD JOIN NEW GROUP @CloseFriendsCommunity
New FedBan Fed: แด ส. แด๊ฑสแดสแด'๊ฑ แดแดแดสแด{แดสแดแดษดษชx าแดแด แด 35} @phoenix_f3d_v35 FedAdmin: NEET JEE STUDY POINT User: เผ๏ธโช๏ธโพโผโพโช๏ธ๐ฏ๐๐โช๏ธโพโผโพโช๏ธเผ๏ธ User ID: 1932646577 Reason: {SWx08} - ADDING SPAMBOTS {SWx09} - ADMIN RIGHTS ABUSE {SWx18} - BAN EVASION Mera koi dushmani ni gabbar se bhai jaisa maana sb kuch diya group ka ownership diya fed diya sb diya Rfs ka ek naam diya aur tune ky kiya jb uda rha tha tb bhi maine pucha ky kr rha kuโฆ
https://t.me/CloseFriendsCommunity
New un-FedBan Fed: แด ส. แด๊ฑสแดสแด'๊ฑ แดแดแดสแด{แดสแดแดษดษชx าแดแด แด 35} @phoenix_f3d_v35 FedAdmin: โฌโ IRISเผ โโฌ User: Zhobin User ID: 1617940969 Reason: LEAVE IT CHECKING
New FedBan Fed: แด ส. แด๊ฑสแดสแด'๊ฑ แดแดแดสแด{แดสแดแดษดษชx าแดแด แด 35} @phoenix_f3d_v35 FedAdmin: โฌโ IRISเผ โโฌ User: Zhobin User ID: 1617940969 Reason: CHECKING
New Fed Promotion Fed: แด ส. แด๊ฑสแดสแด'๊ฑ แดแดแดสแด{แดสแดแดษดษชx าแดแด แด 35} @phoenix_f3d_v35 Promoted FedAdmin: โฌโ IRISเผ โโฌ User ID: 1998376046
โ๏ธ ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ โข: โ๏ธ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง๐๐ก๐ง ๐๐ก๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง ๐๐ป THE ARC NETWORK { @The_Arc_Network } IS NOW BEEN BLACKLISTED BY @PHOENIX_EMPIRE AND CLOSE FRIENDS COMMUNITY { @CFCHUB } ๐๐ป ARC NETWORK RUN BY SOME GOONS OF TELE WHO ARE SCAMMER AND TOXIC PEOPLES. ๐๐ป SO BEAWARE OF THEM Sighn off : @phoenixwarmed Powered by : @PHOENIX_EMPIRE Community : @CFCHUB
https://t.me/PHOENIX_EMPIRE/217
โ๏ธ ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ โข: โ๏ธ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง๐๐ก๐ง ๐๐ก๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง We are launching new bot @Miss_Elena_Robot Add @Miss_Elena_Robot Join support chat [ @cfc_bot_support ] [ @elena_support_group ] Bot maintain by @gauravsingh003 Powered by : @PHOENIX_EMPIRE Community : @CFC_HUB
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Phoenixfedlogs_v35. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Theory of natural selection was given by
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2021 to 13 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Phoenixfedlogs_v35 named 24 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ฟ. ๐ฃ๐๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ'๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ {แดสแดแดษดษชx าแดแด แด 35}โ (@Phoenixfedlogs_v35), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phoenixfedlogs_v35.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.