Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кубок Фенікса VIIІ

@PhoenixCupVII

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

214subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349191838
TypeChannel
Username@PhoenixCupVII
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PhoenixCupVII

Growth

2147 Aug 2026, 04:48 — 214 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:41 — 214 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:488 Aug 2026, 00:41
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 213–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:41214no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:48214first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 10 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3356.9%
❤‍🔥1220.7%
🤓1017.2%
👏23.45%
🎉11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 16:56 UTC165 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👮‍♀️Кубок Ректора — юридичний турнір цього літа у Львові 🤓Турнір з особливістю — усі теми будуть на правову тематику (навіть якщо ти не юрист — ГС колегія за необхідності надасть певні посилання для підготовки) 😎Літні дебати у чудовому місті — вдень дебатуємо, а ввечері гуляємо по Львову (не хвилюйся, офіційний соушилз запланований) Офлайн, 26-27 липня (плануємо, однак, як іноді буває — життя підкидає певні випроб

❤‍🔥1

12 Mar 2025, 10:15 UTC221 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @persha_stPhoto

🏮 І сходить червоне сонце... Міста під його сяйвом готуються до нового дня, вітер розносить рожеві пелюстки сакури, які так схожі на маленькі лусочки дракона. Озброєнні самураї запекло змагаються між собою за місце під сонцем, і звук битви ехом розноситься по всьому небу. А дракон пильнує, хто ж стане спадкоємцем золота і кубків, що він приберіг для турніру? І красуються знамениті, палаючі самураї, та зовсім не ле

❤‍🔥1🎉1🔥1

19 Feb 2025, 12:58 UTC208 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @artprixPhoto

What moves men of genius, or rather what inspires their work, is not new ideas, but their obsession with the idea that what has already been said is still not enough. – Ежен Делакруа Важко заперечити, що дебати – свого роду не мистецтво! Тож запрошуємо вас поринути в атмосферу краси слова та думки, звеличення прекрасного та величного вже зовсім скоро. ✨ Де? – У культурній столиці України – Львові! ✨ Коли? – 22-23

❤‍🔥1

3 Jan 2025, 09:23 UTC256 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fight_debate_clubPhoto

Подолати страх. Відсікти зайве. Відкинути все що не має справжньої цінності. І зареєструватися на Fight Club, встигнувши вибороти своє місце під сонцем 🥊 Ти приїдеш не для слави. І не для нагород.Ти приїдеш, щоб перевірити себе. Готовий? Тоді чекаємо на тебе у Києві. ⛓️ Реєстрація тут ⏳ Дедлайн реєстрації - 26 січня, 23:59. З усіх питань звертайся до @Msksnr або @sunny_alchemist

28 Nov 2024, 09:37 UTC559 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нарешті переможці отримали свої кубки. Дякуємо вам за участь і до нових зустрічей!

🔥19❤‍🔥1

10 Nov 2024, 16:17 UTC699 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Результати турніру! 🔥Топ-судді – Єлизавета Шевченко, Микита Андреяненков та Данііл Збінський 🔥Топ-спікер новачків – Марія Кушнір 🔥Топ-спікер досвідчених – Герман Ніколенко 🔥Переможці новачкового треку – Nah, I'd win! (Теленко Орест, Протопопова Уляна) 🔥Переможці треку досвідчених – Exceeds Expectations (Герман Ніколенко та Христина Шкрябіна) А також публікуємо теб!

🤓10❤‍🔥8👏2🔥1

10 Nov 2024, 15:09 UTC580 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Початок церемонії нагородження о 17.15

🔥2

10 Nov 2024, 12:52 UTC586 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Початок фіналу о 15.08 у 1 сесійному залі

🔥3

10 Nov 2024, 12:51 UTC635 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЦПВЩ антропоцентричний світогляд в побудові цивілізації є екзистенційною загрозою людства

🔥4

10 Nov 2024, 12:51 UTC626 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ФІНАЛ ДОСВІДЧЕНИХ Антропоцентризм — це світогляд, згідно з яким людина розглядається як центр всесвіту і найвища цінність у ньому. Цей підхід ставить людські інтереси, потреби та моральні принципи вище за все інше в природі, включаючи інших живих істот і екосистеми. Відповідно до антропоцентризму, природа має цінність лише тією мірою, якою вона корисна або служить людині. "Екзистенційна загроза людству" у цих дебат

🔥1

10 Nov 2024, 12:50 UTC427 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Початок фіналу о 15.05 2 сесійний зал

🔥1

10 Nov 2024, 12:49 UTC518 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЦПВЩ людство як основу свого життя має обрати гедоністичний ідеал

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @PhoenixCupVII. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 504,648 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кубок Фенікса VIIІ” (@PhoenixCupVII), 214 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhoenixCupVII.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.