Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Верните Петю маме

@Petyasmamoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

187subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201714887
TypeChannel
Username@Petyasmamoi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Petyasmamoi

Growth

1877 Aug 2026, 18:06 — 187 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:05 — 187 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:068 Aug 2026, 12:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 186–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:05187no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06187first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 187 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 February 20257 August 2026)
Views total69
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Videos
4
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 54s
Average length
3m 29s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
318100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо Александре и Жене, что всегда со мной 🙏🏻

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC27 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @am_marova

Анатомия абсурда в семейных спорах Любой маразм дело рукотворное. Наши оппоненты ручками активно работают 🤪 Все помнят Дашину историю. Началось все с далекого 2020 года. Тогда наш совсем не уважаемый оппонент забрал у Даши малыша Петю, которому было 2 года. Круг первый. Решением Савеловского районного суда города Москвы от 31.03.2021 года место жительства ребенка определено с матерью. Апелляционная и кассационна

5

14 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо Саше за ведение архива этого беспредела 🤪

14 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @am_marova

Вчера было судебное заседание по делу Даши и Пети о лишении Даши родительских прав. Крч. Маму надо лишить родительских прав потому что она излишне была активна на исполнительных действиях по передаче ей ребёнка, который с ней должен быть согласно судебному акту. Активность преподносится как «ломала ребёнку руки», «избила представителя» (я с трудом, честно говоря, представляю как можно избить вот эту суровую женщину

6

11 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC164 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @am_marovaPhoto

Кассационный суд сегодня рассмотрел кассационную жалобу Розанова на определение Мособла о месте жительства Пети с матерью и в удовлетворении требований жалобы отказал. С Дашей был Женя, а я прослушала по итогам аудиозапись. Что только в ход не шло - мама стилист и визажист, а Пете нельзя там где лаки, у матери перепланировка незаконная, а апелляция это пропустила; у матери живет собака, а у Пети может быть аллергия.

14

4 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC210 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @am_marovaPhoto

Помните историю Даши и Пети? А нового представителя папы Антонину «я тебе ща въе*у» Вергунову-Боганович? Антонина тут дала папе Розанову распрекрасный совет - подать иск о лишении Даши родительских прав. И вот сегодня по делу состоялась беседа. Антонина «ща въебу» Вергунова зашла с козырей и сообщила Даше, что ее посадят. За ложный донос. Под доносом, могу предположить, понималось доведение до широкой общественнос

7

22 Apr 2026, 18:53 UTC309 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И я поверила ей, а как иначе? Мы заходим, я даже не заметила, что не зашел мой представитель, юдверь перед ним закрыли. Я подхожу к сыну Пете, который сидит за столом, тяну к нему руки, он встает, я беру его за плечи, притягиваю и крепко обнимаю, чтобы выйти с ним из комнаты. И натыкаюсь на двухметрового пристава, который не дает мне выйти. Представитель отца начинает орать и вслед за ней как по команде орет ребёнок!

28

22 Apr 2026, 18:52 UTC256 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Позавчера были исполнительные действия по передаче мне ребёнка на основании решения суда. На исполнительных действиях, где надо просто исполнить то, что вынес суд, на меня кричала матом и оскорбляла юрист должника, то есть отца ребёнка, который делает все, чтобы ребёнка не передавать. И на это совершенно спокойно смотрели приставы, не пресекая такое поведение! Но самое главное сами приставы и не позволили мне забрать

24 Jan 2026, 12:59 UTC330 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Иногда месть киднепперов не знает границ — у Вероники бывший муж не только отобрал ребенка, но и посадил девушку в сизо, подставив ее. Просьба разместить у себя статью Александры для общественного резонанса

7

24 Jan 2026, 12:59 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @am_marova

Друзья, в одну статью объединила то, что вы уже знаете про историю Вероники, плюс добавила скрины и материалы, громко именуемые следствием «доказательствами».

7

15 Dec 2025, 12:37 UTC445 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Саша, Женя, спасибо огромное вам!!!!!!

22

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Petyasmamoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Верните Петю маме” (@Petyasmamoi), 187 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Petyasmamoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.