Channel
@Period_Nine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
246subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003465399050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Period_Nine |
| Created | 17 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Period_Nine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 246 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 243 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (17 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📌本 频 道 出 售 OPTE.COOL | 流量玩家俱乐部 - https://t.me/optecool_group 1. 飞机引流软件—-OPTE全能TG营销系统 【功能包含：群组/频道采集、批量群发、批量私信、强制邀请进群、频道克隆、群组炒群、关键词监听、批量创建群组/频道/bot、批量订阅点赞等功能，自主研发了用户名检测、排名占位引流、账号加固等独家功能。】 2. jiso/soso等索引已收录频道群组出售 【搜索引擎已收录，排名前页的频道群组】 3. Telegram官方广告投放/过审/代运营服务 【官方广告户现户、已过审频道/bot出售】 4. 飞机号源头批发，自助取号机器人 @TGper168_bot 。 【 各国直登号、API号、协议号、新号老号私人号批发零售，百万库存，欢迎验证】 所有业务公群保障，也可拉专群担保 @tgper8 白班 09:00-18…
OPTE 矩阵中控 v1.0.143 · Windows - 专业级 矩阵运营 中控平台 https://tools.opte.cool 面向 Telegram 多账号场景的一站式运营工具：批量管理账号、自动执行营销任务、采集群组与频道数据， 配合智能节流与代理策略，让你专注业务而不是重复点击。
当前频道可出售，需要更多频道请订阅关注频道自选 流量频道购买 | 💵 统一售价：9 USDT | 💬 购买联系：@optecool 🛒 购买规则：单个起买 9U/个，10个起买 6U/个 ⚠️ 注意：所有群或频道均来自各大群组频道置顶消息占位，关注频道前往占位流量频道 | 在线挑选！ OPTE.COOL | 流量玩家俱乐部 - https://t.me/+h-9N-imUblFhMmYx OPTE.COOL | 官方频道（请订阅关注） - https://t.me/+VlKjMIPOynFmYjNh
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @Period_Nine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 457,420 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OPTE.COOL | Period_Nine” (@Period_Nine), 246 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Period_Nine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.