Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚡️ Perfect Gamble ⚡️

Channel

⚡️ Perfect Gamble ⚡️

@PerfectGamble

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

566subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002523029039
TypeChannel
Username@PerfectGamble
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PerfectGamble

Growth

553566559.57 August 2026 — 553 subscribers8 August 2026 — 553 subscribers15 August 2026 — 554 subscribers29 August 2026 — 566 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 551–568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 14:03566+12
15 Aug 2026, 04:38554+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:36553no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:03553first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6433.2%
🤣5830.1%
🔥3819.7%
105.18%
👍73.63%
❤‍🔥52.59%
🤝31.55%
custom 521967583788795626821.04%
21.04%
🐳21.04%
🤔21.04%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC403 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2 раза на 200 ходила лошадь эта, пусть валяется в общем, может доготовят её)

7

19 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC382 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знаю запушат или нет, но солана порой удивляет своими деплоями)

10

19 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC329 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/Yoda4ever/status/2078482548641194452/video/1?s=52

🤔2

19 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC326 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/genabeton_HbGVzMdUnxQu1dYcWFQYU3LboHF32rwY9Cem1WZ6pump HbGVzMdUnxQu1dYcWFQYU3LboHF32rwY9Cem1WZ6pump

🔥5

15 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC437 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Произведение искусства от уважаемого комьюнити) отображает реакцию на новый лаунчпад на робингуде))

🤣8

15 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC425 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣17🔥53

13 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC464 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

3 икса, начало положено)

🔥106🤝3

12 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC403 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Х48 Ноу коментс) даже китайцы со своими шальными свечами на бск нервно курят

84custom 52196758378879562682

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PerfectGamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚡️ Perfect Gamble ⚡️” (@PerfectGamble), 566 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PerfectGamble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.