Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pearl Gargoyle Steel

@PearlGStyle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002303589062
TypeChannel
Username@PearlGStyle
DescriptionFounder @lukoshki, по заказам в лс
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PearlGStyle

Growth

12310 Aug 2026, 08:16 — 123 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 123 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:1610 Aug 2026, 08:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:30123no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:16123first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
6
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6642.3%
🔥3925.0%
💘138.33%
🍓85.13%
🆒63.85%
🥰53.21%
💋42.56%
👏31.92%
🤩31.92%
💔21.28%
🗿21.28%
😈21.28%
😍21.28%
🦄10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 May 2026, 15:03 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectroGoth1Photo

🌹Встречаемся сегодня под светом красных софитов, цепей и роз. ❕Перепродажа билетов до 23:00 (После билеты можно будет приобрести на входе но дороже) 🔟9️⃣8️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣🔢#️⃣*️⃣ 💳Б И Л Е Т Ы от 1100 руб 💳

🔥6

23 May 2026, 15:02 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectroGoth1Photo

🔗 Gargoyle - диджей, несущий на танцпол холодную эстетику ночного андеграунда. В его сетах переплетаются darkwave, EBM, synthpunk и мрачная электроника с гипнотическим грувом и тяжелым пульсом. Это звук неоновой ночи, клубного дыма и танцев на грани транса — музыка, которая медленно затягивает и уже не отпускает до самого рассвета. Уже завтра! 🔟9️⃣8️⃣ 23 Мая | 23:59 | Eclipse 🔢#️⃣*️⃣ 💳Б И Л Е Т Ы от 1

5

7 Mar 2026, 02:18 UTC289 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectroGoth1Video

Video, posted without a caption

4🔥4😈2

6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC270 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectroGoth1Photo

⭐️ Dread Lich x Gargoyle: две черные звезды! У каждой своя траектория. Gargoyle - пульс индастриала и холод новой волны, Dread Lich - мистика дарквейва и глубины холодной волны. Одна бросает вызов - другая отвечает. Одна разгоняет темп - другая уводит в глубину. Вместе они создают ту самую химию, ради которой хочется оказаться в центре зала и не уходить до последнего аккорда. 6 Марта | 23:59 |Клуб «Eclipse» 💳БИЛЕТЫ

🔥42

3 Dec 2025, 12:50 UTC457 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbrodcommunityPhoto

Сегодня наш плейлист пополняет Gargoyle — резидент Electrogoth. Gargoyle — адепт неоготики, в каждом миксе знакомит слушателя с различными поджанрами темной культуры в самых ярких и мощных её проявлениях. В подборке вы услышите новинки и классику эстетического дарквейва, ebm и dark-disco, которые погружают в атмосферу тягучего декаданса. 🎧 Слушать

6🔥4👏3

19 Nov 2025, 15:19 UTC471 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectroGoth1Photo

Еще одна участница маркета - GARGOYLE, автор уникальных кольчужных украшений ручной работы. Каждое изделие Кристины - это тонкая работа, металл, превращённый в искусство, и эстетика, идеально подходящая тёмной сцене. И в этот раз она порадует вас не только своим сетом, но и собственной коллекцией украшений, которые можно будет примерить и приобрести прямо на маркете. 💳 БИЛЕТЫ от 900 руб. 22 Ноября, 23:59 Клуб «Ecli

3

15 Oct 2025, 13:36 UTC484 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🙏Обереги членусы на заказ: серьга или карабин 🙏 1000 RUB

🆒6💋4🗿2

15 Oct 2025, 13:33 UTC414 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥀 Колье «Doll Rose» 🥀 4000 RUB

7🔥3💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @PearlGStyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,133,321 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pearl Gargoyle Steel” (@PearlGStyle), 123 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PearlGStyle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.