Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пчёлка рисует

@Pchela_Bi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

391subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003840315520
TypeChannel
Username@Pchela_Bi
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pchela_Bi

Growth

3916 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 391 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:14 — 391 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:037 Aug 2026, 20:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 390–392 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:14391no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03391first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
139.7%
avg views ÷ 391 subscribers
Avg views / post
546
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,376
Reactions total726
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

726 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45562.7%
🍓14920.5%
💋517.02%
👀375.10%
💔344.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 726reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC117 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Несмысленыш Малифитрек в процессе Постримить процесс чтоль как с Сомбрхольдом 🙂

27🍓4👀2

4 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC630 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Думаю, ему бы 🌟понравилось 🌟🌟под дождем 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #СансараСМП #SansaraSMP #Meyerhold

28🍓12💔3💋2

4 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC647 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ты не представляешь, каково это - провести столько времени в одиночестве ☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️ Мое сердце разбито 😢 У меня моральная травма Заберите его кто-нибудь из этого места 😭 ☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️ #СансараСМП #SansaraSMP #Meyerhold

28💔11🍓1👀1

3 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC232 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

23🍓2

3 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC221 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Отзыв? Вторая часть Сансары совершенно не похожа на первую. Она на столько же глубже - на сколько глубже спускается Мыслан. При первом просмотре, как бы «поверхностном» - первичном, я нашла пару очевидных для меня загадок, какие-то даже получилось разгадать. Локации выглядят потрясающе, мои любимые лес с «воронкой» в центре и пустыня, но больше всего меня зацепили персонажи. Насколько я поняла, все они – это бывши

24💋5🍓3

3 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC212 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я как ребенок разрыдалась

💔20

3 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC234 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сансара СМП спойлеры!!! Я добралась до просмотра наконец-то...Ещё смотрю, ещё в процессе. ...Честно говоря, у меня мурашки пробежали от книги Найтмера. От его ситуации в принципе. А ещё ну... Я не знаю, был ли этот шифр разгадан (я не заходила в конфу сансары, чтобы не нахвататься спойлеров) но эти картины меня смутили и я решила проверить Это пиздец как стремно.

25💋4👀1

2 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC263 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, буду показывать резы заранее... Малефисента 😏 ...Лолотрек изучен на 1%

👀238

1 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC724 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💜👑 𝓚𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓢𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓪 👑 💜💜💜💜🔹💜💜💜💜 #Meyerhold #Mine_Villains

33🍓11👀3

30 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC837 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🍺 Мейер 🍺 Я уверена, он пил не вино, но этот мем сам возник в голове Мне стало смешно и я перерисовала быстренько хаха #Meyerhold

46🍓14💋2👀1

29 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC375 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Вы мне не верите, а он Верити 🙄

28🍓13👀3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Pchela_Bi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,896 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пчёлка рисует” (@Pchela_Bi), 391 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pchela_Bi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.