Channel
@PatriziaRametta
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
752subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001236466378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PatriziaRametta |
| Created | 12 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PatriziaRametta |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 752 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 754 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 757 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 759 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 759 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 85.7% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
PER QUELLI CHE … questo governo di cdx non ha fatto niente …. Claudio Borghi Aquilini In questi giorni di forsennato attacco mediatico alla Lega c'è chi semina disfattismo. Poi c'è chi dice che siccera lui avrebbe spaccato le montagne e prosciugato mari. Io cucino con gli ingredienti che ho e come Lega abbiamo ottenuto un po' di cose che qui elenco solo per amore di verità, perché tanto so perfettamente che a chi vo…
👍10
https://open.substack.com/pub/claudioborghiaquilini/p/ucraina-il-subprime-deuropa?r=kn0eh&utm_medium=ios Ma come è possibile che un impegno finanziario di simile portata non sia mai passato per un voto parlamentare negli Stati membri e mai discusso in Commissione Bilancio per le opportune analisi e deliberazioni? Rimane alle cronache solo un recente voto al Parlamento Europeo relativo al prestito da 90 miliardi ovv…
👍5
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/757717
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/757053
https://substack.com/@patriziarametta/note/c-273740037?r=kn0eh&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
MAGISTRALE @Capezzone rinfrescate bene la memoria oggi voi che vi domandate quanto pazzo sia Trump ... ce lo dirà la Storia e fra due anni ci sarà un nuovo Presidente (in Italia Mattarella 14 anni, è democrazia?) Di sicuro non abbiamo dimenticato trent'anni di egemonia sinistra con Prodi che ha svenduto l'Italia e ci ha venduto con Dalema alla UE, Conte che ha guidato il governo più disastroso e voleva consegnarci ai…
👍9
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/749837
👎1
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/749139
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/748947
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/748774
https://t.me/PatriziaRamettaChat/748611
https://x.com/hungarybased/status/2049209534716027236?s=46&t=J9ADCg3yC1Cg7CPSe5qXFA
👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PatriziaRametta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Patrizia Rametta Ortigia” (@PatriziaRametta), 752 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PatriziaRametta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.