Channel
@Pass_Required
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002587650509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pass_Required |
| Description | Честные истории о карьере от молодых профессионалов. Помогаем школьникам, студентам и выпускникам понять, куда двигаться дальше. Сайт: http://ekaterinamenyaylo.tilda.ws/pass_required 🎧 Реализуется в рамках конкурса «Твой ход». |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 26 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pass_Required |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 97 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
197 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5397650048454524306 | 40 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5397986151120268931 | 17 | 8.63% | |
| custom 5397723784453060312 | 15 | 7.61% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 7.61% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 6.09% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 6.09% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 5.58% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.58% | |
| custom 5397859320736018180 | 8 | 4.06% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 4.06% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 3.05% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.54% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.508% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙ПОСТ КОНКУРСА Влад придумал провести для вас такой конкурс, ну и кто мы такие, чтобы ему отказать?) Будем разыгрывать книгу «Бизнес с нуля. Метод Lean Startup для быстрого тестирования идей и выбора бизнес-модели» Эрика Риса 🗒 Правила предельно просты: 1. Подписаться на телеграм-канал Влада 2. Задать свой вопрос в комментарии под этим постом 3. Поставить реакцию 4. Ждать результаты (до 12 января)! Влад ответит н…
🔥9😍6🍓4
🎙НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК ПОДКАСТА🎙 В гостях Владислав Лукшенас, продакт-менеджер Ozon, студент Вышки и автор тг-канала о карьере (обязательно подписывайтесь!) В выпуске обсудили: 🤩Что такое продакт-менеджмент на самом деле и как объяснить свою работу бабушке. 🤩Главные иллюзии новичков и за что на самом деле отвечает продакт («ни за что не отвечает, но всё решает»?). 🤩Какие навыки важнее всего на старте и какие можно прокачать…
🔥8🏆5😍5🥱1
Новый выпуск... скоро! 📌 Завершаем этот год красиво и пополняем ваш список видосиков, которые точно нужно посмотреть на зимних выходных. Гость, как всегда, секретный. Но вам точно нужно знать, что он: - работает в 😉 product-менеджером - учится в Вышке - автор клевого тг-канала Включайте уведомления, ставьте напоминания 🗓 30 декабря, 18:00 С гостем поговорим о построении карьеры в менеджменте и о том, как совмещат…
👏5👍3🍓2
💚 НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК ПОДКАСТА 💚 В гостях Катя Караваева, бэкенд-разработчица в Т-банке, преподавательница и студентка магистратуры ВШЭ. Она совмещает три жизни в одной и делает это круче, чем кто-либо (ну объективно ха-ха). В выпуске поговорили: - про путь в разработку и как попасть в бигтех, - про преподавание и как не сойти с ума от студентов, - про совмещение всего на свете и борьбу с дедлайнами, - про то, как отдыхат…
💅8💘6👍4custom 53976500484545243062👀1
🌩 ЗАВТРА новый выпуск подкаста! В этот раз у нас гостья из Т-банка. Кто именно — не скажем 👀 Но намекнем лишь, что она крута! Она из тех, кто успевает работать в бигтехе, учиться в магистратуре и ещё преподавать студентам ВШЭ. Поговорим: - о том, как не выгореть, если живёшь в дедлайнах и куче задач, - как совмещать несколько жизней в одной, - как правильно отдыхать, чтобы не полететь кукухой. 🗓 28 октября, 18:00…
🥰11🔥9👏7👍1custom 53976500484545243061
Кстати, ждете новый выпуск? 😏 (по секрету, гостья тоже из Т-Банка)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👀 Почему проиграть в кейс-чемпе не так уж и плохо? После победы ты будто выдыхаешь. Радость, эмоции и... тишина (дофаминовая яма). Кажется: Ну вот, я всё доказал. Можно немного притормозить, устроить расчилл. А когда проиграл, то все наоборот, внутри что-то щёлкает. Ты начинаешь копаться: где накосячил, почему не пошло, как сделать лучше. И в этот момент реально растёшь. 💬 Был случай с одной командой, которая посл…
custom 53977237844530603125custom 53976500484545243063custom 53979861511202689313🥱1
☕️ 5 ресурсов, которые помогут подготовиться к кейс-чемпам Если ты только начинаешь участвовать в кейс-чемпах или хочешь прокачаться перед новым сезоном, то вот подборка, с которой реально стоит начать 📌 🌩 Учебник от Changellenge — changellenge.com/book Просто и по делу: структура кейса, примеры решений, советы по защите. Один из лучших стартов для новичков. 🌩 Case Studies от McKinsey — mckinsey.com/about-us/case-…
🔥3🤪2custom 53979861511202689312custom 53976500484545243061custom 53977237844530603121
Не будь тем, кто тащит всё на себе: тревожные звоночки в команде Бывало, что только начали работать над кейсом в кейс-чемпе, а уже чувствуете, что что-то не то? Один пашет, другой куда-то пропал, третий не понимает, что происходит 😳 Вот несколько тревожных звоночков, которые стоит заметить заранее 👇 🗒 Тема вообще не заходит. Если видно, что ребятам неинтересно, они не копают, не спорят, не предлагают — значит, вов…
👍5custom 53979861511202689313custom 53977237844530603122
Договариваться с жюри о переносе дедлайна, потому что вам еще немножко
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Игнорировать мнение одного из участников команды, потому что он не шарит
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Собирать команду исключительно из друзей
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Pass_Required. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кстати, ждете новый выпуск? 😏 (по секрету, гостья тоже из Т-Банка)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Договариваться с жюри о переносе дедлайна, потому что вам еще немножко
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Игнорировать мнение одного из участников команды, потому что он не шарит
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Собирать команду исключительно из друзей
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 30 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 615,263 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вход по пропускам” (@Pass_Required), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pass_Required.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.