Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ParsCanada.com

@ParsCanada

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

7,587subscribers

-2,510 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006122820
TypeChannel
Username@ParsCanada
Descriptionآخرین اخبار و مقالات مهاجرتی کنپارس و ParsCanada.com ارتباط با ما: @CanparsProfessionalServices
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ParsCanada

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@canpars/392331 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC@ParsCanada/8162 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@ParsCanada/8168 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC@canpars/392931 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@canpars/39351 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC@ParsCanada/8174 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@canpars/39364 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC@ParsCanada/8175 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@canpars/39497 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC@ParsCanada/8182 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@canpars/39557 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC@ParsCanada/8194 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@canpars6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@canpars (51)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @canpars. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,58724,75316,1705 August 2026 — 10,097 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,097 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,354 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,071 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,753 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,634 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,587 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2,510. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,012–27,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:047,587-47
9 Aug 2026, 14:147,634-17,119
8 Aug 2026, 10:3624,753+3,682
7 Aug 2026, 10:3321,071+4,717
6 Aug 2026, 13:5116,354+6,257
6 Aug 2026, 02:4810,097no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:3510,097first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.78%
avg views ÷ 7,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
362
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.321%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held14 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total5,074
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,120
Videos
1,340
Links
3,990

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
42m 27s
Average length
7m 05s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC172 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

قبل از مصاحبه CBSA برای Section 44 و قبل از پاسخ به PFL این ویدیو را ببینید یک ایرانی در فرودگاه متوقف شد. افسر CBSA چند سوال درباره سابقه خدمت اجباری در IRGC مطرح کرد. سپس به او اعلام شد که برای یک مصاحبه رسمی با افسر CBSA احضار خواهد شد تا احتمال صدور گزارش s.44 و inadmissibility بررسی شود. این شخص از اهمیت این مصاحبه آگاه نبود و در پی تعیین وقت هر چه سریع‌تر بود. خوشبختانه پیش از مصاحبه با ما تماس گرفت. واقعیتی که

1

11 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC284 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

جواب PFL شما در این مرحله مهم‌ترین سند پرونده‌ شماست. خیلی از افرادی که PFL گرفتن فکر می‌کنند این فرمالیته‌ست یا اینکه تصمیمی است گرفته اند و فرقی نمی کند چه جوابی بدهیم. اشتباه بزرگی است. جواب PFL شما نه فقط یک پاسخ ساده، بلکه پایه و اساس کل پرونده مهاجرتی‌شما برای مراحل و حتی پرونده های آینده‌ست. چرا باید جواب PFL رو قوی و کامل بدهید؟ دلیل اول: شاید مشکل رو اینجا حل کنید. اگه افسر IRCC با مدارک و توضیحات قوی شما مت

1

8 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC353 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

یک ویدیوی مهم که برای یادآوری بازنشر می کنیم

8 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC418 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

خبر فوری برای ایرانیان مقیم کانادا با سابقه خدمت اجباری در IRGC در روزهای اخیر تعداد زیادی از هموطنان ما Procedural Fairness Letter یا همان PFL از طرف IRCC دریافت کرده‌اند. این نامه به معنای رد مستقیم پرونده نیست — اما اگر اشتباه مدیریت شود، می‌تواند درِ تمام مسیرهای بعدی را برای همیشه ببندد. 📌 PFL چیست؟ IRCC به شما اعلام می‌کند که نگرانی امنیتی بر اساس s. 34(1)(f) IRPA دارد — عضویت در یک سازمان تروریستی. خدمت اجباری

7 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC360 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سه انتخاب مهم اکسپرس انتری در سه روز متوالی؛ اما هر انتخاب برای گروه متفاوتی از متقاضیان بود. در تاریخ‌های ۴، ۵ و ۶ آگوست ۲۰۲۶، اداره مهاجرت کانادا سه انتخاب جداگانه برگزار کرد: 🔹 نامزدهای استانی PNP ۵۰۷ دعوت‌نامه حداقل امتیاز CRS: ۷۶۸ 🔹 سابقه کانادایی CEC ۳۰۰۰ دعوت‌نامه حداقل امتیاز CRS: ۵۱۶ 🔹 متقاضیان فرانسوی‌زبان ۵۰۰۰ دعوت‌نامه حداقل امتیاز CRS: ۳۹۱ نکته مهم این است که حداقل امتیاز این سه انتخاب را نمی‌توان م

7 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC302 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

تازه‌ترین آمار اکسپرس انتری نشان می‌دهد که بانک متقاضیان کوچک‌تر شده، اما رقابت در امتیازهای بالا شدیدتر شده است. بر اساس داده‌های ۳ آگوست ۲۰۲۶، تعداد کل پروفایل‌های موجود در بانک متقاضیان به ۲۲۹,۱۰۰ رسیده؛ یعنی نسبت به ۱۹ جولای، ۲,۴۳۳ پروفایل کمتر. اما در همین فاصله، تعداد متقاضیان با امتیاز CRS بین ۵۰۱ تا ۶۰۰ حدود ۱,۵۷۲ نفر افزایش داشته است. در مقابل، کاهش اصلی در بازه‌های پایین‌تر دیده می‌شود؛ از جمله: • ۴۰۱ تا

4 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC527 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اگر مدت‌هاست قصد دارید برای پرونده مهاجرتی خود اقدام کنید، اکنون فرصت مناسبی است تا از قیمت‌های ویژه خدمات منتخب CanPars تا پایان ۳۱ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ استفاده کنید. 🔹 پناهندگی (Refugee Claims) 🔹 برنامه‌های استانی انتاریو (OINP) 🔹 اکسپرس انتری (Express Entry) 🔹 پرونده‌های انسان‌دوستانه (H&C) 🔹 ویزای توریستی (TRV) 🔹 مجوز اقامت موقت (TRP) 🔹 سوپر ویزا (Super Visa) 🔹 اسپانسرشیپ همسر (Spousal Sponsorship) 🔹 برگ سفر مقیم دائم (PR

1 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC541 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

آیا اگر سرباز وظیفه سپاه بوده‌اید، باید نگران اقامت یا حتی اخراج از کانادا باشید؟ در روزهای اخیر، نگرانی و شایعات زیادی درباره وضعیت افرادی که سابقه خدمت وظیفه در سپاه پاسداران دارند منتشر شده است. طبیعی است که بسیاری از افراد و خانواده‌هایشان احساس اضطراب کنند؛ اما آیا آنچه در فضای مجازی گفته می‌شود، با واقعیت حقوقی و رویه‌های مهاجرتی کانادا مطابقت دارد؟ در ویدیوی دوم این مجموعه، به جای تکرار شایعات، به واقعیت‌های ح

31 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC447 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

More than 228,000 Economic Permanent Residence applications are still waiting for a final decision at IRCC. If you think your delayed immigration application is an isolated case, these official statistics may change your perspective. Using official IRCC data as of May 31, 2026, we analyzed Canada's immigration application inventory to better understand where delays are occurring and what they mean for applicants. 📊 I

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ParsCanada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ParsCanada.com” (@ParsCanada), 7,587 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParsCanada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.