Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Parhib group

@Parhibgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

591subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001130077340
TypeChannel
Username@Parhibgroup
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Parhibgroup

Growth

59110 Aug 2026, 05:01 — 591 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:07 — 591 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:0110 Aug 2026, 15:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 590–592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:07591no change
10 Aug 2026, 05:01591first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 591 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (11 May 20255 August 2026)
Views total202
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
28m 52s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC81 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/z2SXVOGrReY?si=v_P7V_IT-9T5Hf2u

30 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC121 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @architecturevents

https://youtu.be/00mkeJuHAnw?si=Pjf-YM7tRxaq58bI

4 Jul 2026, 03:49 UTC201 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @architectureventsVideo

❌قسمت دوم "دیدار با فریار جواهریان" . نشست به دعوت مجله بخارا. موضوع باغ ایرانی. خرداد ۱۴۰۱ فریار جواهریان آزاده شاهچراغی محمدرضا حائری مازندرانی علی دهباشی

4 Jul 2026, 03:49 UTC165 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @architectureventsVideo

❌قسمت اول "دیدار با فریار جواهریان" . نشست به دعوت مجله بخارا. موضوع باغ ایرانی. خرداد ۱۴۰۱ فریار جواهریان آزاده شاهچراغی محمدرضا حائری مازندرانی علی دهباشی

4 Jun 2026, 22:14 UTC649 viewsread 10 August 2026

اول ژانویه 2026 یک دوره مهارتی و آموزشی به صورت "ترویج علم" با عنوان "روانشناسی در طراحی داخلی" با هدف کمک به افزایش دانش عمومی و طراحی مبتنی بر یافته های علمی در پلتفرم معتبر و شناخته شده UDEMY به زبان انگلیسی منتشر کردم.در پنج ماه گذشته این دوره و تدریس من توسط علاقمندان از تمامی کشورهای جهان از برزیل تا هند و آمریکا و ویتنام و ایتالیا و ...تهیه و دیده شده. ⭕️اما چون دقیقا در این بازه زمانی اینترنت در دسترس علاقمن

26 Dec 2025, 14:49 UTC296 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @maan_tv4Video

📺«باغ ایرانی حافظه‌ی معماری ایرانی است» همانطور که حافظ؛ حافظه‌ی ماست! آزاده‌ی شاهچراغی جرعه‌ای از اسرار باغ ایرانی می‌گوید باغ ایرانی اگر نبود اصلا زندگی در فلات ایران شکل نمی‌گرفت که بخواهد تمدنی به نام ایران به وجود آید! 🔹چرا با زنده کردن باغ ایرانی؛ معماری ایرانی احیا می‌شود؟ 🔹باغ ایرانی در ادبیات و شهر و موسیقی و معماری ما حضور داردو متاسفانه معماری ما جامانده! 🔹مان؛ نقد معماری معاصر ایران https://t.me/

19 Nov 2025, 03:49 UTC359 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @khaneyehketabPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

17 Oct 2025, 01:03 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

دوره تخصصی روانشناسی شهری (بصورت مجازی ) 📍برگزار کننده : مدرسه معماری ایرانی 👤مدرسین: ●دکتر علیرضا بندرآباد ●دکتر آزاده شاهچراغی ✍🏼برخی مباحث دوره: روانشناسیِ شهری چیست؟ شهروندان چگونه شهر را احساس می‌کنند؟ وچگونه رفتار می‌کنند؟ تفاوت ادراک شهر برای مردان و زنان چیست؟ کودک و سالمند چگونه شهر را تجربه می‌کنند؟ احساس امنیت در محله چگونه شکل می‌گیرد؟ مدیریت چالش دست‌فروشی در شهر چگونه ممکن است؟ پاتوق‌ها چگونه شکل م

11 Oct 2025, 15:07 UTC280 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tmuimpdVideo

هوش مصنوعی و ارزشهای "معماری سنتی ایران"، "قنات" و "باغ ایرانی"، دکتر آزاده شاهچراغی در شبکه چهار

6 Sept 2025, 00:56 UTC356 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @architectureventsPhoto

بهشت VR وار ارائه ای از مرکز تک_لب دانشکده هنر و معماری دانشگاه شیراز ۱۶تا ۱۸ شهریور ۱۴۰۴-گالری خانه @architecturevents

6 Sept 2025, 00:15 UTC277 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MemarNewsPhoto

بهشت‌وار ▪️تجربه‌ی سفر مجازی به باغ‌های ایران و جهان 📍برگزار کننده : مرکز معماری اسلامی و مرکز تک‌لب دانشکده‌ی هنر و معماری دانشگاه شیراز 👤دبیر علمی: دکتر کاوه فتاحی |هیئت علمی دانشگاه شیراز| 👤دبیر اجرایی: دکتر محمدرضا فروزنده |مدرس و پژوهشگر معماری| ✍🏻رویداد «بهشت‌وار» به معرفی ۱۴ باغ‌ایرانی و باغ‌هایی از ۷ تمدن باغساز در جهان اختصاص یافته است. روایت باغ‌ها از طریق محیط ۳۶۰ درجه و در قالب سفرهای مجازی با عینک‌ها

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Parhibgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 411,679 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Parhib group” (@Parhibgroup), 591 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Parhibgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.