File, posted without a caption

Channel
مجموعة تعزيز وتأهيل
@PandRweb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
886subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001180709455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PandRweb |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PandRweb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 886 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 887 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 11 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
موضوع اليوم عن Rotator cuff tear 😍🤍🤍🫴🏻
شكر خاص لأعضائنا المبدعين 💘🎖️ محتوى ✏️: سارة السبيعي تصميم🧑🏻🎨: شهد خالد @DPTshahd
Photo, posted without a caption
موضوعنا اليوم عن التصلب اللويحي🤩💘💘
a) Neer test ✅🥳👏🏻
وين اساطير التخصص😏؟!
During a shoulder impingement assessment, which of the following special tests would be most specific for subacromial impingement?
- a) Neer test46%
- b) Hawkins-Kennedy test25%
- c) Empty can test15%
- d) External rotation resistance test14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
حللتم أهلًا ووطئتم سهلًا🌟 ها نحن نفتح أبواب العضوية السنوية لمنصتنا المتخصصة بكل حماس وشغف! #تعزيز_وتأهيل انضموا إلينا الآن وساهموا في إثراء المجال بأفكاركم ومشاركاتكم القيمة! لا تتردّدوا... المقاعد محدودة https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScDhal5qOzqEkGaJILf7hDY6Z0FhTlZPB6-SXCjfcCuBwYSsA/viewform?usp=sf_link
لا تفوتكم محاضرة اليوم عن إعادة التأهيل بعد جراحة تصحيح انحراف العمود الفقري (الجنف) (Post Scoliosis Surgical Correction Rehabilitation) مع الاخصائي المتميز و الاكثر من رائع فواز القحطاني🌟 ✨ننتظركم من الساعة 4 الى 6 مساءً✨ -يوجد شهادة حضور😉!
https://chat.whatsapp.com/EWOCAWvh0cV2vYguiMMzMK
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PandRweb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
During a shoulder impingement assessment, which of the following special tests would be most specific for subacromial impingement?
- a) Neer test46%
- b) Hawkins-Kennedy test25%
- c) Empty can test15%
- d) External rotation resistance test14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2024 to 10 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PandRweb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gUnFW0aSHQMM4MzA8 · 48,023
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجموعة تعزيز وتأهيل” (@PandRweb), 886 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PandRweb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.