3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 217–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:18
217
-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:35
218
no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:45
218
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.5%
avg views ÷ 217 subscribers
Avg views / post
192
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
20 (11 March 2025 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
192
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
231 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
185
80.1%
👍
20
8.66%
👏
11
4.76%
🥰
9
3.90%
💔
6
2.60%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خلل کجاست؟!
چند روز پیش فرصتی فراهم شد و به رسالهٔ وزین مرحوم دکتور یوسف قرضاوی تحت عنوان «أین الخلل» نگاهی انداختم. خواندن این اثر بسیار چسبید و امیدوارم برای شما نیز آنچنان که باید بچسبد.
گزیدههای از آن نوشتار را در ذیل جمع نمودم، شاید مفید واقع شود، رفع ابهامی بکند و گرهٔ بگشاید.
برای خوانش متن کلیک کنید!
سخنی فراموششده
هنوز که با هم به جان کلمات نامرتب ذیل نرفته ایم، فنجانی قهوه و یا چای برگیرید، کنجی دنج و گوشهی آرام برگزینید، موبایلتان را متروک و هر چیز و ناچیز نابجا و دغدغهآفرین را از خویشتن و جان خویش بَر کَنید تا با درآویختن با متن ذیل، فهمی حاصل شود، تغییری پدید آید، نشاط و روحی دوباره به جان دمیده شود و قوت و نیرویی در تن مان ظهور بنماید. به امید آن ذات لایزال که سخنش حق است و وعدهاش حتمی!
سخنی سنگین و…
چین؛ قدرتی خاموش بهدنبال توسعهی اقتصادی و گرفتن نظم جهانی
برای همه هویداست که امروزه دانش موتور توسعهی همهجانبهی کشورها محسوب میشود. با دانش است که بذرهای تعهد و تخصص میرویند، رشد میکنند و سرانجام به چنان بلندی و قامتی میرسند، که مردمان در سایهی آسایش و رفاهاش آرام میگیرند و خنک میشوند. دانش امروزی گستردهتر، پیچیدهتر و پر شاخ و برگتر شده است؛ گویی آنچنان که برای گذشتگان تصرف در همه حوزهها میسر و مق…
حقوق مالکیت فکری؛ رشتهی که از سال ۱۴۰۲ ه.ش به آن سخت وابسته شدم.
میشود گفت که توسعهی همهجانبه کشورها ناشی از توجه خاص بدین رشته است.
نخستین کار تحقیقیای که با علاقهی وافر روی دست گرفتم، حقوق معنوی مؤلف در نظام حقوقی افغانستان بود، که در مجلهی وزین اندیشهی پوهنتون هرات بهنشر رسید.
دومین کار تحقیقی من در زمینهی حقوق مالکیت فکری تحت عنوان« نقش حقوق مالکیت صنعتی در توسعهی صنایع کوچک و متوسط در افغانستان» بود،…
نقش حقوق مالکیت صنعتی در توسعۀ صنایع کوچک و متوسط در افغانستان
سمینار علمی "نقش حقوق مالکیت صنعتی در توسعۀ صنایع کوچک و متوسط در افغانستان" توسط پوهنیار محمد ادریس پناه استاد پوهنځی حقوق وعلوم سیاسی پوهنتون هرات برگزار گردید.
در این سمینار که با حضور معاون علمی پوهنتون، معاون امور محصلان، رئیس پوهنځی شرعیات و علوم اسلامی، رئیس پوهنځی حقوق و علوم سیاسی، آمران دیپارتمنت های پوهنځی حقوق و استادان برگزار شد، استاد ادریس…
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
🏷️ اندر باب کتاب و این روزها...!
👤 محمد ادریس پناه، استاد دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه هرات
و این روزها...،
کتابی با برگهای ریز و درشت و ترجمهی بیبدیل.
حدود یک ماه پیش، همسرم که از علاقهی وافرم به ادهم شرقاوی، کتب و سخنانش بسی آگاه است و میداند که در واپسین ایام دو سال گذشته با آنکه آثار این نویسنده و دعوتگر آشنا و معروف هنوز به دست ترجمه گرفته نشده بود و نسخهای از آن نیز در کتابخانهه…
#تأملات ------------------------------------------------------------------
📖 از کودکی تا بزرگی!
همه آشفته اند. آن شور و شعفی که بباید زیست، آن نشاطی که بباید دید، نیست. همه غرق در این و آن اند، انگار خویشتن را فراموش کرده اند. زندگی و حیات آدمی به واقعیت که عجیب، گاهی جالب و بعضاً تلخ و شیرین است. تمامی دوران زندگی انسان یکسو و شرارتهای کودکی یکسو. در دوران کودکی، انسان آنچنان که باید میزید، به نداشتههایاش …
او نشانهی عشق خداوند به بندگاناش است!
شیفته و دلباختهی او ایم؛ به امید بغلکردنتان یا رسول الله صلیالله علیه و سلم.
جایی بزرگواری سخنی گفت که همانندش نشنیده بودم و تئوریای مطرح کرد که مثالاش ندیده بودم. چه سخن مبارک و چه ادعای پربهایی!
گفت: رسول خدا، حضرت محمد صلیالله علیه و سلم نشانهی عشق خداوند متعال به بندگاناش است.
خوی و عادات او، مهرورزی و محبت او، سلیمالقلب و گشادهرویی او، جمال و زیبایی او، نرم…
حقوق معنوی مؤلف در نظام حقوقی افغانستان
عنوان مقاله: حقوق معنوی مؤلف در نظام حقوقی افغانستان
✍️: محمد ادریس پناه
👍5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PanahEdris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 649,791 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مینویسم” (@PanahEdris), 217 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PanahEdris.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.