А тут.. ну.. у Джульетты обновки https://t.me/Rosaline_poem
Signed 𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑢𝑟𝑦🎀
Channel
@Palais_dHiver
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001833862210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Palais_dHiver |
| Description | Только искусство порождает в человеке человека. |
| Created | 9 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Palais_dHiver |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 21 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
376 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 164 | 43.6% | |
| custom 5460973242380461685 | 121 | 32.2% | |
| custom 5424803922621505497 | 89 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.266% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.266% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2023 to 12 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А тут.. ну.. у Джульетты обновки https://t.me/Rosaline_poem
Signed 𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑢𝑟𝑦🎀
Ауууу, туда все.
🕊4😭1
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
Channel name was changed to «ПЕРЕЕЗД. 𝐿𝑎 𝑐𝑟é𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡é 𝑑𝑒 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒♡»
Вы ждали, вы дождались. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 Причину, по которой открываюсь так скоро я расписала в этом опросе.. Все туда. →→→ @Juliets_abode Будет много перезалива, и не обещаю, что контент будет таким регулярным, как был. Увидимся в новой обители!
🕊7❤1
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
И внезапно я поняла для себя, что не могу прожить без творчества и подобных занятий, мне попросту тяжело унять свои мысли и идеи, ахах.. возвращение? (Не обещаю, что контент будет постоянный.)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊8
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
😍😌🙃😋🙂🙃🥹 😄☺️😊😎😋🥹🙂🤣🥹 Моя дорогая подруга сделала кинни бинго и я подумала, что грех не выложить. (Тем более она попросила.) Если вам интересно, то можете пройти.🐈
🕊15
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
У некоторых осталась читателем. Не волнуйтесь, рано или поздно я вернусь, нооо.. возможно с другими идеями и именем. 👀
custom 546097324238046168512🕊5custom 54248039226215054974
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
Channel name was changed to «ЗАКРЫТО. 𝐿𝑎 𝑐𝑟é𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡é 𝑑𝑒 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒♡»
😄😌🥹😇🥹🙂🙂🙃🥹 😂😀☺️😌🤨🥰🤣🥹‼️ И.. да. Я очень долго думала над этим. Простите меня, но, видимо, я перегорела окончательно. Не знаю, окончательное ли это решение, но я закрываюсь. Я хочу полностью переосмыслить себя, свои таланты, отношение к себе и прочее. Надеюсь на ваше понимание. Может быть, я ещё вернусь. С любовью, ваша Джульетта Венсан.
🕊22custom 546097324238046168512custom 54248039226215054976
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
Переезд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊7custom 54248039226215054971
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
С НОВЫМ ГОДОМ ВСЕХ.🤗 Я искренне благодарна всем людям, которые были со мной в этом году, а ещё больше я благодарна своей чудесной аудитории. Мне приятно, что вы читаете мои работы и любите меня, я желаю вам всего наилучшего. Всех ласково целую в щёки и обнимаю!! Счастливого нового года.🌟
🕊20custom 54609732423804616856custom 54248039226215054975
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
·˚ ༘. ﹒⪩🤎⪨﹒ ·˚ ༘ 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓷𝓼!🦋 ➿➿➿🖼➿➿➿ ˚ ༘♡ ⋆。˚𝓣𝓪𝓰𝓼: #хэды
custom 542480392262150549721custom 546097324238046168518🕊16
Signed 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Palais_dHiver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
И внезапно я поняла для себя, что не могу прожить без творчества и подобных занятий, мне попросту тяжело унять свои мысли и идеи, ахах.. возвращение? (Не обещаю, что контент будет постоянный.)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Переезд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2023 to 12 June 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,173,051 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Palais_dHiver named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД. 𝐿𝑎 𝑐𝑟é𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡é 𝑑𝑒 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒♡” (@Palais_dHiver), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Palais_dHiver.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.