Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Perfect War Map

@PWMmap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,821subscribers

+694 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003383824657
TypeChannel
Username@PWMmap
DescriptionВласник каналу @KonotopezPWM, але краще по всяким питанням пишіть в лс каналу Канали наших адмінів: 1)https://t.me/Warmapsemka 2)https://t.me/UkrWarMap Зарядити канал - https://t.me/boost/PWMmap
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PWMmap

Growth

6,1276,8216,4747 August 2026 — 6,127 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,821 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +694. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,023–6,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:346,821+646
8 Aug 2026, 02:376,175+48
7 Aug 2026, 17:476,127first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.7%
avg views ÷ 6,821 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,930
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held51 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total200,620
Reactions total8,704
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,910
Videos
59
Links
1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

8,704 reactions across 51 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53665185535350743703,05035.0%
👎1,91021.9%
😭1,11612.8%
6827.84%
🤬5215.99%
❤‍🔥2332.68%
😡1711.96%
😱1421.63%
custom 5366532756991925028981.13%
👍941.08%
🤨820.942%
🤣720.827%
😁650.747%
🔥600.689%
550.632%
🤷‍♂500.574%
💩420.483%
🕊390.448%
🤯390.448%
🙏340.391%
20 further kinds1491.71%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,704reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 51 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PWMmap. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈2,240 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺Судячи з кадрів, росіянам вдалося частково закріпитися в Приюті, Торському і Торецькому 🔴Площа просування: 5,1км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

👎87😭295💩4🤬2👍1😡1custom 53665185535350743701

Signed Konotopez

11 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC≈2,460 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺ЗСРФ проводять атаки поблизу Чорного, Харківська область 🔴Сіру зону збільшено на 5,1км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

👎72😡10👍4🤯4🤬1custom 53665185535350743701

Signed Konotopez

11 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈2,710 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏠 Поки ти спиш, вони моніторять небо. Канал, який бачить усі повітряні загрози України 24/7. Дізнайся першим, що відбувається поруч. ⭐️Підписатися в один клік

custom 536651855353507437053👌6🤡32🫡1😍1

Signed Konotopez

11 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,900 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Допоможіть вирішити суперечку з другом, він думає, що Хмельницька область теж трохи частина карпат, як ви вважаєте?

  1. Так22%
  2. Ні84%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤷‍♂50custom 536651855353507437021🔥21👎1

Signed Konotopez

11 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,200 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺ЗСРФ посунулися поблтзу Курилівки, Куп'янський напрямок 🔴Площа просування: 1,28км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

👎93💩16👍6🤬5custom 53665185535350743705

Signed Konotopez

11 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈3,260 views193 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦ЗСУ просунулися поблизу Нестерянки, Оріхівський напрямок 🟢Площа просування: 1,8км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

custom 5366518553535074370175👍76👎4🤗1

11 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,350 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‼️🇺🇦 ЗСУ мають просування на Успенівському, Куп'янському та Добропільскому напрямку! 👀 ↪️ Карта каналу Steppe & State

custom 5366518553535074370140🔥124👎3🤯3🤗1😱1🙏1

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘬𝘴𝘺𝘮

10 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈7,340 views365 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦Також підтверджується прорив в Дворічну, Харківська область 🟢Сіру збільшено на 2км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

❤‍🔥219custom 53665185535350743701237👍6👎5🙏3🕊2

Signed Konotopez

10 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC≈4,290 views213 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤝🕊Висловлюю свої щирі співчуття колезі з каналу "Інтернет Об'єднання Клен" у зв'язку з загибеллю його прабабусі, у мене теж є вона є, і я розумію його почуття в цей момент

😭155🕊3711🤣6👍2😁2

Signed Konotopez

10 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈4,260 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺ЗСРФ продовжують просуватися в Куп'янську 🔴Площа просування: 0,27км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

👎136custom 536651855353507437012🤬9👍7😭4

Signed Konotopez

10 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈4,200 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Якщо вам подобається контент із розборами російських ІПСО та пропаганди, та просто цікавить політичний контент та актуальні події - запрошую на канал до мого доброго знайомого «Правак». https://t.me/mspgn

custom 5366518553535074370774👍1🙏1

Signed Konotopez

10 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈4,880 views574 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺Росіяни закріпилися в Малій Токмачці 🔴Площа просування: 5,1км² 📌Джерело ✨Perfect War Map | Карта фронту 🗺

😭445😱50custom 536651855353507437041🤬19🔥7👎43😁3

Signed Konotopez

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @PWMmap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,090 voters approx.

Допоможіть вирішити суперечку з другом, він думає, що Хмельницька область теж трохи частина карпат, як ви вважаєте?

  1. Так22%
  2. Ні84%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 416,327 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Perfect War Map” (@PWMmap), 6,821 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PWMmap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.