Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Інтернет Обʼєднання «КЛЕН»

Channel

Інтернет Обʼєднання «КЛЕН»

@IA_klen

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,219subscribers

+1,561 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984147389
TypeChannel
Usernames@IA_klen @union_klen
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/IA_klen

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

52,2191,1127 August 2026 — 658 subscribers8 August 2026 — 658 subscribers8 August 2026 — 659 subscribers16 August 2026 — 748 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,081 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,114 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,113 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,148 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,176 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,240 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,268 subscribers27 September 2026 — 5 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8 subscribers3 November 2026 — 1,952 subscribers3 November 2026 — 1,955 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7 subscribers7 November 2026 — 2,219 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
19 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,561. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 01:282,219+2,212
5 Nov 2026, 19:087-1,948
3 Nov 2026, 22:261,955+3
3 Nov 2026, 08:221,952+1,944
21 Oct 2026, 20:318+2
8 Oct 2026, 06:026+1
27 Sept 2026, 15:395-1,263
18 Sept 2026, 16:191,268+28
14 Sept 2026, 03:381,240+64
10 Sept 2026, 04:581,176+28
5 Sept 2026, 01:581,148+35
1 Sept 2026, 11:471,113-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:021,114+33
27 Aug 2026, 00:141,081+26
23 Aug 2026, 22:381,055+307
16 Aug 2026, 18:45748+89
8 Aug 2026, 06:11659+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:35658no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:36658first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.0%
avg views ÷ 2,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held31 (7 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total21,768
Reactions total763
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

870 reactions across 27 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39845.7%
🤔11112.8%
custom 5222250679371839695627.13%
🤡617.01%
❤‍🔥606.90%
😨313.56%
🫡303.45%
custom 5319055531371930585252.87%
😁242.76%
🙏192.18%
custom 5280587278828193324111.26%
custom 5316568354465522940101.15%
🤯80.92%
🔥50.575%
👍40.46%
👎40.46%
🤩30.345%
😎20.23%
😡20.23%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IA_klen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 22:14 UTC705 views17 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://t.me/unionklen Якщо хтось не знає)

❤16🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 22:13 UTC719 views34 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Польский канал знову повертається))

custom 531905553137193058525❤7🤡1custom 53165683544655229401

2 Nov 2026, 21:51 UTC796 views42 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Кста у ляхів теж Двіж) почали якісь міні укріпи робить, повідомляють теж о руху німецької техніки

❤36🤔4🤡1😁1

2 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC615 views57 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Офіційна заява командувача УВ(с) «Азов», бригадного генерала Дениса «Редіса» Прокопенка відносно спроб дискредитувати Національну гвардію України.

❤51😁5custom 52222506793718396951

2 Nov 2026, 21:35 UTC793 views9 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Poll

Почув прохання від кількох хохликів, робимо поширюємо КЛЕН в ДС, Інстаграм, Фейсбук, Макс?

  1. Так50%
  2. Ні20%
  3. Макс? 🤨54%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤯8🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC884 views37 reactionsread 3 November 2026

А тепер всім цьом і добраніч, пора спать 🫡

❤30🫡6🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC≈1,160 views67 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Азов їбе русню в констасі і Добропіллі. А підари нічого не зсмогли зробити, крім постановочки. Ай молодці

❤56🤡6🔥3😎2

2 Nov 2026, 20:52 UTC986 views33 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Короче, скоріш за все, ці двоє повʼязані невідомо як. Або на річ російською пропаганди, або жіночка приїхала так рятувати від відповідальності хлопчика. Але слідкуємо за всім

❤27🤡4😨2

2 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC971 views25 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Так й синяків шось на ньому не видно від того, що били його

❤23👎1🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC940 views27 reactionsread 3 November 2026

А найсмішніше, що зараз скоріш за все,вийде на то, що вони ще й рідня)

❤25👎1🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,040 views50 reactionsread 3 November 2026

А про хлопчика теж чимало інфи. Оказалось як оказалось, сиділо воно, пиздило цеглу, впало, і щоб не бути відповідальним почало клеїти дурня

🤡31😁12❤4🔥2🤔1

2 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC932 views38 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Короче блядота рідкісна

❤‍🔥31❤3👎1🤔1😁1custom 53165683544655229401

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @IA_klen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 21:35 UTCAnonymous Poll241 voters

Почув прохання від кількох хохликів, робимо поширюємо КЛЕН в ДС, Інстаграм, Фейсбук, Макс?

  1. Так50%
  2. Ні20%
  3. Макс? 🤨54%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

На вашу думку нам вдасться якось вплинути на цей закон аби допомогти людям?

  1. Так повністю вдасться виконати задумане12%
  2. Частково вдасться вплинути на рішення43%
  3. Нажаль не вдасться45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Інтернет Обʼєднання «КЛЕН»” (@IA_klen), 2,219 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IA_klen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.