Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PTLSP

Channel

PTLSP

@PTLSP_Group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105675976
TypeChannel
Username@PTLSP_Group
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PTLSP_Group

Growth

699 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 69 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:32 — 69 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:1710 Aug 2026, 00:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:3269no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:1769first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2024, 13:27 UTC346 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://app.follow.is/profile/61932250828240896 里面的某些东西...不好评价

9 Jun 2024, 04:19 UTC906 viewsread 10 August 2026

看了一下投票,大家都想开群组,那就开吧 此群并非只能讨论Lian和PTLSP,可以讨论其它的,和PT无关的也可以:https://t.me/+-X2RXFgUo_gzNjQ8

8 Jun 2024, 11:19 UTC641 viewsread 10 August 2026

差不多结束了,在Lian复出之前,本频道停止更新(在某些情况下保留一切权利)

8 Jun 2024, 10:12 UTC557 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

要不要创建TG私聊机器人和群组,以便大家和我交流和讨论(可多选)

  1. 开私聊机器人23%
  2. 开群组70%
  3. 都不开13%
  4. 我不知道20%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PTLSP_Group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jun 2024, 10:12 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

要不要创建TG私聊机器人和群组,以便大家和我交流和讨论(可多选)

  1. 开私聊机器人23%
  2. 开群组70%
  3. 都不开13%
  4. 我不知道20%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2024 to 27 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PTLSP” (@PTLSP_Group), 69 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PTLSP_Group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.