Channel
@PROslojnoe_legko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
245subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001692871905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PROslojnoe_legko |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PROslojnoe_legko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 245 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 242 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 239 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 236 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 234 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 214 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 209 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
124 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 18.5% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 16.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 8.87% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 5.65% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 4.84% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 4.03% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PROslojnoe_legko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 September 2025 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Каждую неделю контент-план у меня начинался примерно одинаково: открываешь заметки, смотришь на пустой список тем и пытаешься вспомнить, о чём вообще хотела рассказать аудитории. Идей вроде бы много, но они раскиданы по чатам, заметкам, сохранёнкам и просто в голове — самом надёжном, но иногда перегруженном хранилище. Поэтому я решила просто автоматизировать подготовку. Теперь раз в неделю для меня собирается всё …
❤21👍12❤🔥9🔥7
Нейросеть может за несколько минут написать пост, собрать план и предложить десяток заголовков. Но есть одна проблема: чем проще стало создавать контент, тем больше вокруг публикаций, которые выглядят правильно, но не запоминаются. В них обычно есть всё: 🔘 понятная структура; 🔘 красивые формулировки; 🔘 полезные советы; 🔘 призыв что-то сохранить. А вот автора часто нет 🧩 Нейросеть не знает, что у вас сработало в …
😇7🥰1
PRO движение без суеты | Евгения Пономаренко pinned «»
Posted without readable text
❤11✍6⚡5❤🔥2
🎀 Блогер в MIXIT 📍 Удалённо MIXIT — российский бренд косметики и ухода за кожей, который выпускает продукты для лица, тела и волос. Задачи • Снимать и монтировать видеоконтент с собственным участием • Вести рабочий аккаунт бренда в социальных сетях • Адаптировать видеоконтент под разные платформы и форматы • Генерировать идеи и разрабатывать сценарии совместно с креативной командой Требования • Навыки съемки и м…
❤9
может кому то будет интересна данная вакансия
👍3
👁👁 Две лекции от нашего СЕО Ефима, которые стоит посмотреть. 😏 Как быть хорошим фрилансером Позиционирование, рост чека, личный бренд и системная работа. 😏 Не бери в голову Про управление задачами, временем и рабочим хаосом. Включайте на фоне за работой или выделите вечер на просмотр — польза гарантирована ❤
❤3
🍳 Это порыв в моменте Хочу с вами поделиться классными видео, да, я знаю, что сейчас здесь в основном SMM-маркетологи, таргетологи, и можете сказать, что как это относится к нам, но если заменить графического дизайнера на ваше направление, то всё станет на место. Спикер Ефим рассказывает верные вещи, как же нам, фрилансерам, двигаться в океане заказов и не утонуть.
👍2
Как ваши дела? 😊 Вчера я наконец-то закончила статью на тему продвижения на минимальном бюджете. Перелопатила 34 кейса, изучила 25 статей и пришла к одному выводу, что «Телеграм» хорошо стал ранжироваться в SEO.
🔥2
⚠️ Что происходит с Telegram и стоит ли паниковать? После новостей об уголовном деле против Павла Дурова у многих появился закономерный вопрос: что теперь будет с Telegram и его пользователями? Я изучила разбор медиаюриста Светланы Кузевановой в Forbes и вот что важно понимать. 📌 На сегодняшний день обычным пользователям Telegram ничего не грозит только из-за использования мессенджера. Автор статьи отмечает неско…
👍1
PRO движение без суеты | Евгения Пономаренко pinned a photo
Сижу тут собираю информацию в кучу про продвижение в телеграм и наткнулась на переписку с коллегой. Ну что можно сказать, главное, что всё верно написала. 😊 Делитесь, у кого так же было?
❤2😁2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PROslojnoe_legko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO движение без суеты | Евгения Пономаренко” (@PROslojnoe_legko), 245 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PROslojnoe_legko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.