https://t.me/PROKCl

Channel
прокси репер крутой
@PRO_KCI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002659069539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PRO_KCI |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 11 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PRO_KCI |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 18 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 9
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PRO_KCI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2025 to 18 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
гав
Voice message, posted without a caption
блять какой же я ахуенный 🤩🤩 + я не ищу бро (искл: написал сам)
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ⎯⎯ ㅤㅤмой щп тгк !ㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ🤍𝑤𝑤 . 𝐌𝐀𝐈𝐍 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐂𝐄 ﹠ 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒 🎀🤩😻🔗𝓻𝓾𝓵𝓮𝓼 ﹠ 𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 🎁 🎥🎥🎥🎥🎁 ⋮ люцифер ищет себе принца / принцессу٫ кто же станет им/ею😻❤️ 🎀🖤🎀✨ 🤍𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 ⋮ @PROKC1
Sticker, posted without a caption
когда опозорил короля ада перед грешниками, но он просто не понимает, что ты милый тсундере мальчик:
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PRO_KCI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
прокси :
- бог43%
- принцесса26%
- мой кумир31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
𓐄𓐄✰ у-пс, кто вы, my stars ? ? ?
- незнакомец . .61%
- знакомый )9%
- мой бро !5%
- мой фанат ! )))18%
- ohh, хейтер .11%
- я вас боюсь - -14%
- хотите познакомиться !22%
- хотите со мной встречаться, lol )9%
The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ᅠ
- guilty43%
- innocent57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 18 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 817,091 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“прокси репер крутой” (@PRO_KCI), 18 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PRO_KCI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.