Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

~ Попи ₊˚ʚ ᗢ

@POPA0207

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080240687
TypeChannel
Username@POPA0207
Descriptionлс- @poppy_airilover анон- @poppyanon_bot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/POPA0207

Growth

2856 Aug 2026, 20:19 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:196 Aug 2026, 23:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 284–286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:17285no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:19285first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.5%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,491
Reactions total253
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,490
Videos
452
Links
206

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59337312018681096704718.6%
custom 54742140295536025793313.0%
custom 53932388206887932733112.3%
custom 51954596998765985182811.1%
custom 53886621464878495192811.1%
259.88%
💘176.72%
custom 5465504119345141725155.93%
custom 535496282806107019093.56%
🍓93.56%
custom 539317566319469034241.58%
custom 536175778844589048731.19%
custom 541361303314447934631.19%
10.395%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC65 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nyankCatVideo

🤩🤩Попикэт возвращаются!🌟 ⊹ ࣪ ˖🤩🤩🤩 мы тут с Анечкой Попи поставили танец на фоксы, в ШизуАйри! 🤩 ᯓ★🤩ак что вот мини спойлер к нему🌟

🍓5💘2custom 53549628280610701902custom 541361303314447934621custom 53617577884458904871custom 53932388206887932731custom 59337312018681096701

1 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC174 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁ ⟡ ݁ . ⊹ ₊ ݁.🤩📱📱📱 🤩🤩🔤 я тут выложила наше выступление в тик-токе... Если не хотите ждать пока я не выложу сюда, то можете перейти по ссылочке! 🤩🤩 (то же самое с Би-комачи!)🤍🤩 ˖ ݁♬⋆.˚𝄞~☺️удем очень рады вашим репостам и лайкам🤩🤩 https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8eEVBKp/

🍓41custom 53549628280610701901custom 53617577884458904871custom 53932388206887932731custom 54136130331444793461custom 59337312018681096701

31 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC173 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩оточек нету, потому шо попа балбеска🤩 🥹🎀Ну если найду (надеюсь) ... То скину!🤩

custom 547421402955360257932💘1custom 51954596998765985181custom 53886621464878495191custom 53932388206887932731custom 59337312018681096701

31 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC176 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⋆౨ৎ˚⟡˖ ࣪🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Я наконец-то приехала домой... В родные Чебоксары!🎀Итак, шо могу сказать...🤩🤩 ╰☆૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ╮♡〰 🖇️🤩🤩есто проведения фестиваля мне зашло, всего было 3 небольших этажа, и на 2-ом было больше народу, чем на остальных (т.к. там была ярмарка и ТОРИ ФОКС🩷) 🤩 🤩Из-за этого я еле как ходила и даже некоторым чуть ли не в лицо попадала своими крыльями🩷🩷 🖇️🤩🤩а день ко мне под

💘52custom 53932388206887932732custom 51954596998765985181custom 53886621464878495191custom 54742140295536025791custom 59337312018681096701

26 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC221 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4custom 51954596998765985184custom 53886621464878495193custom 54742140295536025791custom 59337312018681096701

26 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC223 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51954596998765985184custom 54742140295536025793custom 5933731201868109670211

26 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC216 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53932388206887932733custom 59337312018681096703custom 519545969987659851821custom 54742140295536025791

26 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC200 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51954596998765985182custom 53886621464878495192custom 547421402955360257921

26 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC199 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51954596998765985182custom 538866214648784951921

26 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC173 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 539323882068879327321custom 53886621464878495191custom 59337312018681096701

26 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC163 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54742140295536025796custom 53932388206887932733custom 593373120186810967021custom 53886621464878495191

26 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC178 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🥹🎀🩷🩷 ⋆. 𐙚 ˚🔤оточка в фулл рост! Бегаю без нимба, потому что он поломался🤩

custom 593373120186810967064custom 54742140295536025794💘1custom 51954596998765985181custom 53886621464878495191custom 53932388206887932731

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @POPA0207. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,268 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“~ Попи ₊˚ʚ ᗢ” (@POPA0207), 285 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/POPA0207.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.