В общем данная статья переделывается уже все лето, я хз выйдет ли она (а если и выйдет то как новая статья) до конца августа но посмотрим. Эту статью используйте на свой страх и риск 😘
❤4👎1

Channel
@PKombat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
490subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002359859021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PKombat |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PKombat |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 490 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 493 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 486 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 480 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 480 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 76.6% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 19.5% | |
| custom 6039343618748062450 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.30% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В общем данная статья переделывается уже все лето, я хз выйдет ли она (а если и выйдет то как новая статья) до конца августа но посмотрим. Эту статью используйте на свой страх и риск 😘
❤4👎1
еще один 😮💨 P.s ещё тогдашний один из подбитых танков, 1 & 6 фото
❤10👎4
Posted without readable text
❤8👎1
Также есть и ходовые тренажёры для обучения механика-водителя. Например — советская серия ХТВ (Ходовой тренажер вождения на базе танка Т-64/72/80), или же немецкий Leopard 2 Fahrschulpanzer. #хтв #т72 #т64 #leopard2 Project KOMBAT
❤11👎1
Т-64БВ и БМП-1 3-го батальона 14-й отдельной механизированной бригады во время манёвров на территории Яворовского военного полигона под присмотром военнослужащих Национальной гвардии Нью-Йорка, март 2018 года. Диванное военное обозрение
❤3👎1
Posted without readable text
❤7👎1
З цього ж відео — ураження нового Т-72Б3А з КАЗ «Арена-М» (це две друге уражнння такого танку, див.) [фото 1 і 2] і двох нових Т-72Б3 обр.2024 з ДЗ «Реликт» на ВЛД і бортах корпуса [фото 3 - 5].
❤6👎3
Ещё пару кадров с другого видео, Арены-М при наличии ячеек КАЗ-а просто проигнорировала (минимум) 8 Дронов. На втором фото видео прекрасно наличие контр-боеприпасов для КАЗа, самое интересное что это уже перед уничтожением танка, то есть, Арена буквально ничего не перехватила, а если и перехватила то все это осталось за кадром. Танков с Ареной-М не много, дай боже меньше Т-14, так что встаёт вопрос о установке КАЗа "…
❤10👎3custom 60393436187480624502🤨1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @PKombat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project KOMBAT” (@PKombat), 490 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PKombat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.