Хотите выжать максимум из нейросетей за минимальные деньги? https://t.me/+k7CJJvI76Lo0ZmIy
💩13😁2

Channel
@PENTHAUS
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,101subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001088870522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PENTHAUS |
| Description | Я лишь вплетаю ленточки истины в потоки фантазий, экспериментов и провокаций. Не все тут правда, не все тут ложь. Прошу вас, не воспринимайте все посты буквально. Пишите письма на @AddedSugars Рекламный пост – 1000 TON |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PENTHAUS |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 6,101 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 6,105 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 6,112 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 6,113 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 6,113 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (28 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,155 |
| Reactions total | 149 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
422 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 322 | 76.3% | |
| 👍 | 87 | 20.6% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 3.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 437reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PENTHAUS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хотите выжать максимум из нейросетей за минимальные деньги? https://t.me/+k7CJJvI76Lo0ZmIy
💩13😁2
– Я трачу на ИИ в месяц более $10 тысяч долларов! ...сказал бы я вам, если бы был дураком. На самом деле в 10 раз меньше. При этом получаю ценности именно на эти $10 тысяч и даже больше. Первое, что я сделал, когда стал заниматься ИИ, это написал свой роутер – сервер, через который проходят все мои запросы к ИИ, собираются ответы, записываются в память и анализируются на качество. Сегодня это называется harness, а…
💩19👍6😁5
Чуда не случится. Если вы лично или ваши партнер/подчиненные не тратить в месяц хотя бы $1000, то через пару лет ваша актуальность будет утеряна. Простыми словами – вас обойдут те, кто уже сейчас применяет ИИ. И да, мнение, что "ИИ тупой" может существовать только в устал тех, кто не умеет им пользоваться. Более того, им мало кто умеет пользоваться полноценно даже на глобальном уровне. Но те, кто учится этому сегодн…
💩10👍1
Все хотят использовать самый прогрессивый ИИ, так называемый – frontier models. Это Fable и Opus 5, ChatGPT 5.6, Grok 4.5 и так далее. Но они дорогие, медленный и не всегда доступные или с лимитами. При этом для 90% повседневных задач в том числе в бизнесе, а точнее "в основном в бизнесе", могут делать модели в 10-100 раз дешевле. При этом открытые и быстрые. Просто надо уметь выбирать то, что лучше всего решит тв…
💩14👍4
Labs Personal AI Computer Flash — это полноценный персональный ИИ на зашифрованной флешке. Вся ваша память, файлы, настройки и история общения всегда с вами. Подключите её к любому компьютеру — и ваш ИИ мгновенно «проснётся», уже зная ваши документы, проекты, заметки и предпочтения. 🧠 Помнит всё, что вы ему рассказывали. 📁 Понимает ваши файлы и документы. 💬 Работает через чат, голос, веб и Telegram. 🌍 Работает по в…
💩11👍4
Попробуйте заказать бургеры в Макдональдс, убрав соус. Это будет просто картон. Попробуйте выпить различные кофейные напитки без сиропов. Это будет просто горькая молочная вода. Попробуйте греческий салат без оливкового масла. Это просто нарезаные овощи. Попробуйте чипсы без соли. Вкус картошки вас скорее всего не устроит. При этом соус, сироп, масло, сахар, соль, перец составляют лишь 1% от блюда. Думаю, вы уже…
👍21💩12
Послушайте обязательно...
💩11👍2
Люди не понимают ту угрозу, которую несет ИИ в личную жизнь. А потом уже может быть слишком поздно. Долгое время мы жили так, как нас учили родители, школа и окружение. Потом бренды и поп-культура стали формировать наши мысли, желания, действия, память, ощущения. Но нам казалось, что мы все еще контролируем каждое свое решение. А поисковые системы, социальные сети и рекомендаторы самых разных форматов подкручивали …
💩11👍3
Больше всего мне нравится идти против толпы. Нет, не сам протест, а ощущение, что можешь иметь мнение, когда остальные просто пересказывают мейнстрим. Так было почти с любым рынком, в котором я стартовал – веб в 97-м, мобильные аппы в 2003-м, сошал медиа в 2007-м, крипта в 2013-м, каналы Телеграма в 2015-м, блокчейны в 2017-м, дексы в 2020-м, ИИ в 2023-м, личные ИИ в 2025-м. Быть первым почти всегда хорошо, ты заби…
💩14👍8
Я, кстати, думаю поднимать pre-seed раунд на робота, $5-10 миллионов. Это не предложение, а скорее публичная запись. Чтобы к ней вернуться через полгода. Такую же я сделал 29 декабря ночью в Питере, когда начал его делать. Я думаю, что моя ставка на персональных ИИ-роботов, на базе опен-сорс и опен-вейтед моделей, полностью кастомных с минимальным эдж инференс – это то, что будет нужно каждому человеку в мире. 10 …
💩14👍9😁1
Сегодня последний день, чтобы попасть в закрытую группу первых пользователей нашего ИИ-помощника, которого мы просто называем – Робот. Он умеет намного больше чем любой из ваших привычных ИИ-чатов, работает в Телеграм, помнит все. Это тот самый ЛИЧНЫЙ помощник, а не рабочий организатор. У человека кроме работы есть еще 16 часов в день, и наш робот поомогает проживать их на максимуме. https://t.me/+k7CJJvI76Lo0ZmIy
💩16👍7
Твой личный помощник, которому в реальной жизни ты платил бы $1000-2000, теперь может быть виртуальным. При этом уже сегодня делать половину нужных и важных задач, а со временем, лучше узнвая тебя и развивая свои навыки, сможет дойти и до 90% замены живого человека на удаленке. Вот только стоить он будет всего $100. А для моих подписчиков, кто вступит в эту группу и первым получит к нему доступ, вообще бесплатно. …
💩17😁3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @PENTHAUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 92,209 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕНТХАУС • Since 2016” (@PENTHAUS), 6,101 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PENTHAUS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.