Engagement
7 posts held, back to 2 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.5%
- avg views ÷ 324 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 47.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
29 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026 Forwarded from @DeFCoN_Network_NewsPhoto
🚀 DeFCoN Core v22.1.4 has been released
This is a mandatory network upgrade for all participants. Wallets, masternodes and other services must upgrade before block 113,117.
Why upgrade:
• Deterministic recovery from the July 2026 chain split
• Stronger chain validation and safer node behavior
• Improved ChainLock signing and BLS security
• Hardened bootstrap seed infrastructure
• Dedicated Multisig GUI
• Final rele…
PAC Protocol Portal pinned a photo
12 Jun 2026, 12:38 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026 Forwarded from @DeFCoN_Network_NewsPhoto
🚀 DeFCoN Core v22.1.3 Release
A new DeFCoN Core version (v22.1.3) is now available on GitHub. Upgrading is recommended for all masternode operators to benefit from the latest stability and performance improvements, but it is NOT a mandatory protocol upgrade.
🔧 Masternode Update Helper
For an easy and streamlined masternode upgrade, you can use the community Masternode Update Helper:
https://github.com/MrMarsellus/d…
PAC Protocol Portal pinned «Hey everyone 👋 PAC Protocol has been abandoned by its original operators for a long time – but the idea is not dead. DeFCoN (DFCN) is the community‑driven successor project that picks up PAC’s original vision, massively improves it, and gives PAC holders…»
26 Mar 2026, 12:26 UTC207 viewsread 8 August 2026 Hey everyone 👋
PAC Protocol has been abandoned by its original operators for a long time – but the idea is not dead. DeFCoN (DFCN) is the community‑driven successor project that picks up PAC’s original vision, massively improves it, and gives PAC holders a new path forward.
DeFCoN is built and run by former PAC community members who refused to accept that PAC would simply disappear. Our goal is to continue and evol…
24 Jan 2022, 16:45 UTC≈7,390 viewsread 8 August 2026 Welcome to the PAC Protocol portal channel.
This portal is here to protect the PAC Protocol community from bad actors.
Make sure to solve the CAPTCHA below and gain access to our telegram.
Kind Regards,
PAC Protocol team
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @PACProtocol_chat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PAC Protocol Portal” (@PACProtocol_chat), 324 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PACProtocol_chat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
