Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OXUJI ESPORTS

Channel

OXUJI ESPORTS

@OxujiEsports

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

485subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601963576
TypeChannel
Username@OxujiEsports
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OxujiEsports

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4855094977 August 2026 — 509 subscribers8 August 2026 — 509 subscribers15 August 2026 — 498 subscribers22 August 2026 — 490 subscribers28 August 2026 — 489 subscribers6 September 2026 — 487 subscribers13 September 2026 — 485 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 481–513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 15:16485-2
6 Sept 2026, 02:58487-2
28 Aug 2026, 22:43489-1
22 Aug 2026, 20:25490-8
15 Aug 2026, 18:36498-11
8 Aug 2026, 04:15509no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:42509first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

320 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10934.1%
🔥5517.2%
😢4413.8%
😈237.19%
💔185.63%
🏆134.06%
😭134.06%
custom 5442741651669795615103.13%
👏92.81%
custom 540706407989643000182.50%
🕊82.50%
🫡72.19%
custom 541599984955008605210.313%
😁10.313%
🤝10.313%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OxujiEsports. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈3,970 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

НУ ЧТО Ж, ФИНАЛЬНЫЙ ВЛОГ! 🥺 Затянули мы конечно с этим последним постом, хотелось попрощаться с вами всеми красиво. Практически 4 года – мы старались радовать вас, покорять новые вершины, ставить перед собой большие задачи и успешно выполнять их. Мы заходили в разные дисциплины и несмотря на все трудности в каждой из них добивались успеха! 😄 Valorant (#31 VLR) 🥇- x15 🥈- x5 🥉- x7 😄 Standoff 2 (#6 ESFORCE) 🥇- x8 🥈-

😢20😭137💔4

14 Jun 2026, 13:34 UTC920 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забираем третью и закрываем соперников 2:1 по картам! ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

12🔥5👏4😈1

14 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC843 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Разменялись пиками, переходим на десайдер! 💬 Онлайн трансляция ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

8🔥3custom 54070640798964300013😈1

14 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC684 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня нас ждем крутая игра против Nuclear TigeRES в рамках турнира EPL Series 7! 💬 Трансляция будет тут Заходите поддержать ребят! ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

custom 544274165166979561562🔥1custom 54070640798964300011

13 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC597 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Закрываем вторых на сегодня оппонентов, соперников будто подменили 😳 ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

😈52👏1

13 Jun 2026, 09:59 UTC424 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не получается справиться с поляками. Покидаем CCT 2026 EU Series 4. Сразу готовимся к следующей игре! ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

😢3🫡1😈1custom 54427416516697956151

13 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC369 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐈‍⬛ Сегодня у нас снова две игры и в двух разных турнирах! ❗️Уже начали игру против brazylijski luz в рамках турнира CCT 2026 EU Series 4, проигравший вылетает с турнира! ❗️Вторая игра против коллектива Misa, которым мы проиграли уже в группе на EPL Series 7 и сейчас обязаны брать реванш. Проигравший также вылетает с турнира! 💬 Первая игра уже началась! ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

4🔥2custom 54070640798964300012😈1

11 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC356 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥺 Не зашла сегодня игра, проигрываем 2 игры подряд в турнире, следующую проигрывать нельзя. 🏆 Статистика игры ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

😢6💔3😈2🫡1

11 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC295 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, мы тут играем CCT 2026 EU Series 4 против коллектива Bebop и уже забрали первую карту! 💬 Стрим тут! ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

🔥62👏2😈1

9 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC313 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В очень близкой игре уступаем 0:2. 🗺 Dust2 - 13:16 🗺 Nuke - 13:13 ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

6🔥1🕊1🫡1

9 Jun 2026, 15:28 UTC324 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все же отдаем первую карту сопернику, перемещаемся на свой пик (Nuke) 💬 RU Трансляция 💬 EU Трансляция ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

7🫡2🤝1😈1

9 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTC272 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уверенно побеждаем первого соперника на сегодня в рамках турнира EPL Series 7! Готовимся к вечерней встрече против Virtus.prо уже в рамках турнира CCT 26 Europe Series 4! (Игра в 17:00 по мск) ❤️❤️❤️- Наши партнеры 😄 OXUJI | VK | X | YouTube

10🔥3👏2😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OxujiEsports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OXUJI ESPORTS” (@OxujiEsports), 485 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OxujiEsports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.