Channel
@Owlto_Finance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
69subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001571360794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Owlto_Finance |
| Created | 24 July 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Owlto_Finance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 69 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 70 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 70 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 24 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🔚April is ending soon, time to share check-in records in the comments! Take a look at @FireIn50, who has been checking in on @zksync for the entire month. How about you? Let's see your achievements, a delightful surprise waiting for you.👀💪
🚀Congrats! #Linea has reached a historic peak with a TVL of about $740M 🎉 Join the adventure on #LineaVoyage with @Owlto_Finance and deploy your smart contracts on @LineaBuild. 💡 Check out here👉 linea.build/activations
🤝Thrilled to announce our collaboration with @QuickswapDEX, the leading DEX & AMM on all #Polygon chains! 🌐Together, we're taking the DeFi world by storm and ready to bring you the best in Web3 👀 Stay tuned for more to come...
🦉New integration with @TaprootChain You can seamlessly bridging $BTC between #Taproot and @ethereum @arbitrum @BNBCHAIN @BTClayer2 Mainnet/Canary @MerlinLayer2 @BitlayerLabs @BSquaredNetwork 👉 owlto.finance/?to=Taproot
Owlto Finance pinned a photo
📢 Call for all owltors join Owlto x Blast Bridger campaign 🔸 Bridge any token from/to @Blast_L2 🔸 Claim your exclusive NFT https://app.galxe.com/quest/OwltoFinance/GCFNFthrj5
Owlto Finance pinned «"If you have a problem regarding : 1. Fund not arrived 2. Check-in problem 3. Doing a Task but not success 4. Referral problem 5. Others but related with owlto Please open https://discord.com/channels/1091253788481961994/1138350398349004810 provide…»
"If you have a problem regarding : 1. Fund not arrived 2. Check-in problem 3. Doing a Task but not success 4. Referral problem 5. Others but related with owlto Please open https://discord.com/channels/1091253788481961994/1138350398349004810 provide the details (your hash, address, source and target network). We will record and submit to related team. And last, we NEVER DM FIRST. if you find anything suspiciou…
Channel created
Channel photo updated
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Owlto_Finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 912,295 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Owlto_Finance named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Owlto Finance” (@Owlto_Finance), 69 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Owlto_Finance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.