Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OverSpell

@OverSpell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674280140
TypeChannel
Username@OverSpell
Created13 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OverSpell

Growth

6313 Aug 2026, 07:33 — 63 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:19 — 63 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 07:3313 Aug 2026, 11:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:1963no change
13 Aug 2026, 07:3363first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 13 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2434.3%
1825.7%
👍1521.4%
🤩710.0%
🎉34.29%
🥰34.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2022 to 4 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Feb 2023, 08:45 UTC810 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

MetaDOS Closed Alpha Test is open for registration Dear Heroes, Our MetaDOS partner is going to complete the Closed Alpha version and invites you to participate in the Closed Alpha Test. You will be one of the first to experience the next generation Battle Royale Game that uses the concept of time as currency. Heroes & Empires and MetaDOS will be the pioneering games launching on our own network - DOS Chain ⏳ Tim

5👍5

3 Jan 2023, 05:01 UTC753 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Announcement: OverSpell Whitelist Beta Testing Event Dear Heroes, We will open the download link of OverSpell - Beta Test Version for our entire community. This will to help us to find bugs and receive more positive feedbacks. By the way, you will be one of the first users to experience OverSky' new game, OverSpell - Battle Royale Game using the same NFTs and Tokens from Heroes & Empires. ⏰ Timeline: Until 00:00 (

👍43🔥3🤩3

15 Dec 2022, 05:01 UTC643 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

OverSpell Whitelist Beta Test OPEN NOW Dear Heroes, We are selecting 200 people worldwide to play our Beta Test. You will be one of the first to experience Heroes & Empires' new game, OverSpell - Battle Royale Game using the same NFTs and Token from Heroes & Empires. ⏳ Timeline 👉 Recruitment: Until 23:59 (UTC) December 25th, 2022 👉 Gameplay: We will announce it when the recruitment completed ⚡️ Testers daily task

6🎉2👍1🔥1🥰1

29 Nov 2022, 13:11 UTC≈1,080 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

OverSpell Gameplay Demo - A Battle Royale game featuring HE's heroes ✨✨ The Heroes & Empires ecosystem has been working on a new Battle Royale Game that will be available soon, using the same NFTs and Token from Heroes & Empires. 🎮 And here is the OverSpell Gameplay Demo. In #OverSpell, 64 players must fight for their life in a scaling down battle. 👉 We will be doing a quick survey to select the next 6 heroes that

🔥9👍5🤩31🎉1

14 Nov 2022, 00:01 UTC527 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

First 4 heroes were finished, who's next? https://feedback.overspell.com/roadmap

🔥2🤩1🥰1

31 Jul 2022, 02:51 UTC642 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

We are working on the first heroes in OverSpell. Who do you want to bring from @HeroesEmpires first? Please comment on our group chat

🔥93🥰1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @OverSpell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,465,877 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OverSpell” (@OverSpell), 63 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OverSpell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.