Channel
@OutOfHogwards
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001685452592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OutOfHogwards |
| Description | Авторский блог Ольги Великановой Архитектор контента, дизайнер впечатлений, бизнес-игры 🔸 Как создавать контент, играя в игры 🔸 Как впечатления двигают бизнес 🔸 Как работает метод кошачьей шерсти И кое-что про дырявый пододеяльник Связь: @Koshatika |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OutOfHogwards |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 24 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 26.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 21.7% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 8.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2023 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😊☁️ Чемпионат прыжков по лужам Это ваш личный вызов взрослому миру, который слишком часто забывает, что радость тоже важна. 1️⃣ Вспомните детство Ах, эти славные времена, когда за вами бегали с криками: «Не пачкай одежду!» или «Ты что, не видишь лужу?!» Вспомните чувства, которые вы испытывали. Азарт, вселенское любопытство или тайное желание сделать это вопреки всему? 2️⃣ Найдите современные «лужи» Взрослая жи…
💻 Прыжки по лужам на счастье Пока я сижу за своим волшебным дубом, там прячется проект, о котором я пока почти не говорю. Раскладываю примеры по веточкам, собираю истории и проверяю: счастье — это личное чувство или всё-таки системная штука, которую можно выстраивать как бизнес-процесс? Экономика счастья начинает звучать не как абстракция, а как тренд. Вот примеры: 🇧🇹 Бутан первым сказал: «Нам важнее не ВВП, а ВН…
✒️ Уникальный контент за 5 минут: Секреты креативного мышления Этот материал разработан специально для тех, кто сталкивается с «креативным блоком» в создании контента, для начинающих вести блог и тех кто меняет нишу блога, которые хотят легко и быстро создавать оригинальный контент. С помощью этого материала вы: ✅ Будете находить вдохновение даже в самых обыденных ситуациях. ✅ Узнаете 7 простых и эффективных упраж…
🔥4
🟡 Приветствую охотников за впечатлениями, ловцов эмоций и создателей историй в контенте. 📐Я Ольга Великанова — архитектор контента, дизайнер впечатлений, адепт юмора и амбассадор котиков. Копирайтер и редактор со странствиями вот уже 4 год. 🃏 Профессионально играю в игры, которые за 2 часа дадут вам десятки идей, о чём писать у себя в блоге и как добавить «Ух-ты!»-эффект в свой бизнес или продукт, чтобы клиенты выб…
🌭2❤1
Отличный пример, как создать уникальный продукт даже если уже всё придумано до нас. Можно взять идею себе для подумать, как это применить. 🏰 вне Хогвартса
❤3
Так вот она какая — акула бизнеса 😄 А акула пера должна носить одежду с перьями? 🤔 Вообще модные показы — это, в первую очередь, шоу. И у них можно подсматривать идеи для создания впечатлений. 🏰 вне Хогвартса
Почему раньше никто не додумался до такой правильной антистресс-раскраски?! А то вот эти все цветочки, да единороги 😏 🏰 вне Хогвартса
😁3
Как назовём новинку?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Китайское экспериментальное огородничество вывело гибрид дыни и арбуза. Скоро во всех магазинах страны. 🏰 вне Хогвартса
Пример неудобного представления итоговой информации про индекс честности банков по ипотеке от Банки.ру. Гордо и сразу написано, что отсортировано по названию банка. Зачем? 🏰 вне Хогвартса
Это я настойчиво наблюдаю за разными VPN, чтобы нормально работал запретограм. Чтобы рассказать про игры, в которые играют люди, для решения проблемы «мне не о чем писать». 🏰 вне Хогвартса
😁3
Пополните свой словарный запас, пожалуйста.
❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @OutOfHogwards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как назовём новинку?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2023 to 3 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 799,894 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игрок со странствиями || Контент и впечатления” (@OutOfHogwards), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OutOfHogwards.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.