Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Otash_Muhammad

Channel

Otash_Muhammad

@Otash_Muhammad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354100778
TypeChannel
Username@Otash_Muhammad
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Otash_Muhammad

Growth

1531931736 August 2026 — 193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 193 subscribers14 August 2026 — 190 subscribers22 August 2026 — 153 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:16153-37
14 Aug 2026, 12:28190-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:02193no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:56193first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.3%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 January 202631 July 2026)
Views total80
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13841.7%
🔥5917.8%
💯3510.6%
💔309.06%
🕊288.46%
💘216.34%
👍154.53%
51.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

…Yarim tunda uyga qaytmoqda erkak Video by_Otash Muhammad

7🕊3💘1💯1

27 Jun 2026, 02:47 UTC303 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉 27-IYUN — MATBUOT VA OMMAVIY AXBOROT VOSITALARI XODIMLARI KUNI MUBORAK! Jamiyatni ishonchli va tezkor axborot bilan ta’minlash yo’lida fidokorona mehnat qilayotgan barcha jurnalistlar, operatorlar, fotomuxbirlar, muharrirlar, boshlovchilar, blogerlar hamda media sohasi vakillarini kasb bayrami bilan samimiy tabriklaymiz! Sizlarning xolis so’zingiz, ijodingiz va mehnatingiz jamiyat taraqqiyoti, ochiqlik va insonla

111💘1🕊1

7 Jun 2026, 07:57 UTC444 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kechinma… Yuqoridagi rolikni ko‘rib, bundan 21 yil avvalgi yosh Muhammadyusuf yodimga tushdi. Otam oddiy inson edilar. Ustachilik bilan shug‘ullanardilar. Odatda ustalar qilgan ishining haqini ish yakunlangandan keyin oladi. Otam ham shunday mehnat qilib, ro‘zg‘or tebratardilar. Lekin mahallamizda Sadriddin aka degan do‘konchi bo‘lardi. Otam o‘sha kishining do‘konidan qarzga bo‘lsa ham, har kuni ichida kremi bor p

💯106💘1🔥1🕊1

23 May 2026, 09:37 UTC471 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tanaffus qilish… Aslida nega kerak? O‘zligingni anglash, qayoqqa ketayotganingni tushunish va ichingdagi “MEN” bilan biroz kelishib olish uchun. Oxirgi vaqtlarda ruhiy bosim meni ichdan qiynayotgan edi. Balki tashqi ko‘rinishim buni sezdirmagandir, ammo yuzimdagi tabassum ortidagi og‘riqni faqat o‘zim his qilardim. Bugun esa biroz tinim olmoqchiman. Aslida nega dunyoga keldim? Mening vazifam nima? Bugun nima qil

💔82🔥1

20 May 2026, 10:13 UTC445 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ko’zlaringdagi so’ngi tomchi yosh bo’lsam, Labingdagi har tabassumni sadosi bo’lsam, Balki buni tilash inson uchun nolishdir, Ammo so’ngi nafas bag’ringda o’lsam…

🔥9💔5💘3🕊21👍1

21 Mar 2026, 08:43 UTC968 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Aslida baxtim ko'zlaring rangi Muallif: Otash Muhammad Ijrochi: Otash Muhammad @Otash_Muhammad

8🕊8👍3🔥3💔2💘1💯1

20 Mar 2026, 13:04 UTC937 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Mehr juda kichik jumla, ammo bu jumlani senga hayotingda bera oladigan insonlarga boringni bersa arziydi… Sezganingizdek bu habarim Mehr haqida Insonlar Mehrni turlicha tasvirlashadi, kimnidir kayfiyati bo’lmasa tabassum qilasiz bu Mehr. Qorni och inson, jonzotga taomlanishi uchun yegulik berasiz bu Mehr. 24 soat vaqt davomida senga bir daqiqa ajrata olgan do’sting, akang, singling, sevikli yoringni e’tibori ham M

4🔥4💯2👍1💘1🕊1

20 Mar 2026, 09:21 UTC724 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Yuqoridagi savollarga javob bergan bo’lsangiz, ortidan tinglashga arziydigan musiqa…

🔥5💔1🕊1

20 Mar 2026, 09:18 UTC728 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bugungi kun tongi shunday manzillar ila boshlandi… Tilovat qila turib javobi og’riqli savollar hayolimni tinchligini buzishga urindi va uddaladi. •Hozir qay makondamiz? •Qanday sohada faoliyat yuritamiz? •Qancha mol-u dunyoga egamiz? Juda ko’p a pulimiz bor, mansabimiz bor, bu manzilda hozir uyquga ketganlarda yuqoridagi savollarga javob bo’luvchi o’tkinchi narsalar qancha edi? Bizdan avvalgilar kelishdi, biz h

🔥7💔1💘1💯1🕊1

19 Mar 2026, 03:50 UTC572 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🦋Bugun tongda turdim Baxt nima deya o’zimga savol berdim… Tabiiyki javoblar turlicha Nafsimning ichki ovozi qornim to’qligi, ustimni butligi haqida so’z ochsa, ko’zlarim ko’rayotgani, oyoqlarim yurayotgani uchun baxtliman deydi. Aslida tongda uyg’onganim, ota-onamni borligi, sevimli ishimga har kun oshiqib qadam tashlashishim umuman olganda baxt meni borligim. Necha ming inson bugun tongda dunyodan ko’z yumganligi

7💯3🔥3👍2🕊21💘1

16 Mar 2026, 08:48 UTC593 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

- Agar bir juft ko'zlarga oshiq bo'lsang, boshqa ko'zlarni ko'rmaysan...)

🔥74💯3💔2💘2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Otash_Muhammad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,138,719 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Otash_Muhammad” (@Otash_Muhammad), 153 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Otash_Muhammad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.