Posted without readable text
❤6

Channel
@OrientCompliance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
414subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002328815537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OrientCompliance |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OrientCompliance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 414 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 412 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 412 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 April 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,425 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
77 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 46.8% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 15.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤6
От духовного интеллекта к космосу, от космоса к душе... делимся итогами 3-го выездного комплаенс-ретрита ОРИЕНТ, прошедшего 🗓 18-19 июля в Калуге с псещением легендарного духовного места - ⛪️ монастыря Оптина пустынь Эта 2-х дневная поездка запомнилась участникам: ▶️прогулкой с единомышленниками по центру Калуги ▶️посещением музея истории космонавтики (и 3 часов, как всегда, окзазалось мало) ▶️ужином в одном из лучш…
❤9
File, posted without a caption
⚡️⚡️⚡️Итоги совместного практикума ОРИЕНТ с АУРПром на тему: «Неудобные этические кейсы: о чём мы редко говорим» Для мероприятия мы выбрали нестандартный формат практикума: здесь были кейсы, было решение кейсов, но не было изначально верного решения или ответа В рамках мероприятия бы разобрали 3 кейса: ➡️«Если друг оказался вдруг…» о репутационных и иных рисках для ВУЗа в связи с уголовным преследованием бывшего …
👍5
⚡️Приглашаем на вторую встречу цикла мероприятий "Комплаенс 3в1: теория, практики, стратегии" совместно с Институтом комплаенса и этики бизнеса НИУ ВШЭ по теме: "Этические документы, процессы, решения" 🗓24.08.26 (пн) ⏱️ 19.00 - 21.00, сбор в 18:30, начало в 19:00 (мск) 💻 формат: ТОЛЬКО очно (места ограничены) ➡️Есть ли границы у этического регулирования, через что правила транформируются в процессы и как понять, ч…
🔥7
🚀 18-19 июля приглашаем в путешествие в Калугу и Оптину пустынь вместе с комплаенс-сообществом «Ориент»! Два дня, которые объединят профессиональное общение, новые знакомства, интересные дискуссии и яркие впечатления. Концепт наших выездных мероприятий - общение с единомышленниками и друзьями, полезные и глубокие знания, а также практические инструменты для жизни, карьеры и развития личного мастерства Нас ждут: 💎м…
🔥4❤🔥2❤1👍1
Окончание весны ознаменовалось проведением на площадке ❤️ Института комплаенса и этики бизнеса ВШЮА НИУ ВШЭ 🎓 Весенней школы по комплаенсу "Комплаенс - найди себя в профессии", прошедшей уже в шестой раз и объединившей более 150 участников из разных сфер, городов и даже стран! За 😀 дня Школы слушатели смогли познакомиться с профессией, а также, в компании опытных спикеров, погрузиться в отдельные её направления! Тр…
🔥6❤4
Друзья, спешим поделиться интересным и единственным в своём роде проектом коллег из Ассоциации менеджеров - 🏆Рейтингом лучших комплаенс-менеджеров в сфере ПНИИИ/МР, который реализуется при поддержке 🏦 Московской биржи и 🏦 Банка России! Если вы выстраиваете эффективную систему противодействия неправомерному использованию инсайдерской информации и/или манипулированию рынком, формируете лучшие практики рынка — самое вр…
❤4
НЕУДОБНЫЕ ЭТИЧЕСКИЕ КЕЙСЫ: О ЧЁМ МЫ РЕДКО ГОВОРИМ первое совместное очное мероприятие АУРПром и ОРИЕНТ в формате практикума ☑️разбор неудобных, но, увы, реальных этических кейсов: «Если друг оказался вдруг…» - как сохранить лицо комплаенса, если амбассадор оказался волком в овечьей шкуре «Комплаенс-террор» - нецелевое использование кодекса этики ❗️кейс от участника – вы можете предложить свой кейс и мы разберем е…
🔥3
28 апреля прошла первая встреча цикла мероприятий "Комплаенс 3в1: теория, практики, стратегии", организуемых совместно с нашим партнёром - Институтом комплаенса и этики бизнеса ВШЮА НИУ ВШЭ, посвященная организации функции комплаенс. ➡️Спикеры сосредоточились на обсуждении с чего на самом деле начинается комплаенс, как определить его место в структуре компании и почему без ответа на вопрос «зачем мы это делаем?» выс…
👍3🔥2
⚡️⚡️⚡️LAST CALL/последняя возможность: в 12.00 закрывается регистрация на нашу первую встречу цикла мероприятий "Комплаенс 3в1: теория, практики, стратегии", организуемых совместно с нашим партнёром - 💙Институтом комплаенса и этики бизнеса ВШЮА НИУ ВШЭ Это будет честный разговор с экспертами и участниками👇 ➡️Про основы любой эффективной комплаенс-функции и взгляд на комплаенс через продуктовый подход ➡️Про молодых и…
🔥4
🤝Комплаенс-сообщество ОРИЕНТ является информационным партнером КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ “Осознанный менеджмент” Вас ждет глубокое погружение в три ключевых круга влияния руководителя: на себя, на команду и на бизнес. ➡️Вы получите практические инструменты для формирования культуры осознанного управления в вашей организации с целью достижения устойчивой эффективности руководителей и команд. 📅 Даты: 27–29 апреля. 🕒 Врем…
👍2🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @OrientCompliance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 131,817 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ORIENT Compliance network” (@OrientCompliance), 414 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrientCompliance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.